edition and capturing soft

[fjmr]

If I make a dvd disc using prior the following softs for capturing and edition should I have any differences in quality when play at a standalone dvd player?
1. Pinnacle studio9
2. Adobe Premiere 6.5
3. Ulead Video Studio8
4. Nero6
Suppose I burn disc with Nero6.
For quality I mean image quality in a TV set or Projector.
Should one have differences in colour, sharpness, resolutions, etc.

[redwudz]

What format and resolution are you using to capture the video? If you only edit it and don't have to re-encode it to DVD MPEG-2 format, it should have the same quality, color, etc.

If you capture in AVI format, then edit and finally encode, the encoding should be your only loss of quality, and the loss would depend on your encoding settings, mostly the bitrate used by the encoder.

You will also need to have the proper framerate and resolution for the video to be DVD compliant: Look to the upper left for 'What is' DVD to see the DVD specifications. <<<<<<

[fjmr]

Yes capturing from a minidv camcorder adding still photos with a variety of resolutions editing and encoding to mpeg2 dvd format and burning to dvd video.

[Bjs]

Each of the mentioned program's do have similarities on input , but output quality can be different .

[fjmr]

Bjs
Wrote
but output quality can be different

Wich is the difference?
Wich one will give a nice image at the screen of the tvset or Projector
Or better wich one would you recommend for a better image respect to colour sharpness contrast and so on...