I've noticed that when i rip a DVD to an XVCD (lets say 100mins), the quality is worse than when i convert a downloaded divx of the same length. I'm using the same settings for both types. Has anyone else noticed this? Should i rip a DVD to a divx and then encode the divx to an mpeg? This would take much longer but would mean better quality XVCD's. Any ideas?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Quality is a subjective thing. What is most likely happening is the DiVX is a lossy compression format so bits of information has already been thrown out so when you encoded to XVCD the encoder has an easier time because the source is less detailed (from the DiVX compression). Your finally XVCD may look like a higher quality but infact it probably has less detail then the DVD to XVCD rip. My guess is the DiVX-XVCD gives a softer picture and the DVD-XVCD gives a grainier appearance, most people perceive the softer picture as higher quality. I personally prefer detail picture myself. If you prefer the softer look instead of going DVD-DiVX-XVCD, you may just try encoding from DVD using some sort of smoothing filter.
-LeeBear -
That makes a lot of sense, thanks for that. I'm using tmpgenc to encode with. Do you know of a good setting to get that smoother feel?
Similar Threads
-
Stream an MPEG file over UDP as MPEG-TS and convert back to MPEG.
By Tengil123 in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 0Last Post: 27th Nov 2009, 04:40 -
Which format produces better quality overall MPEG-2, MPEG-4 or .x264?
By Canon GL-2 Guy in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 8Last Post: 31st Aug 2009, 03:00 -
Render MPEG-2 for DVD - How to improve quality?
By tripecac in forum EditingReplies: 40Last Post: 16th Jul 2008, 10:26 -
Improving quality of mpeg before converting to dvd...
By AshleyQuick in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 28th Apr 2008, 14:41 -
On the fly versus MPEG encoding
By moorthy in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 9Last Post: 26th Jun 2007, 12:18