VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Member budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    I have to admit I'm a fan of Google Play Music. It's much better than iTunes.

    They organize music in the most efficient way, in my opinion. Multiple database views.

    I noticed the number of Apple users is very low, and I think it's because they can't figure out the different views and how they offer a better experience. They're used to everything on one page as a list.

    What do you guys think? Is the relational database view working for you?
    Last edited by budwzr; 2nd May 2015 at 14:56.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    What is the sound quality?

    I personally cannot stand compression buzz.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    What is the sound quality?

    I personally cannot stand compression buzz.
    Sound quality is the same across all the services. Some claim higher quality, but I can't hear it. There's no compression buzz.

    It's way better than vinyl, cassette, 8-Track, and reel-to-reel. hahaha.

    Mostly my comment is about the way Google organizes the music. It's far superior to simple playlists. Easier to pick up on new music that you might like.

    You need good earbuds. I use Jaybird X.
    Last edited by budwzr; 2nd May 2015 at 15:04.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Are you actually paying $9.99 per month for that music? $119.88 per year. $1198.80 for 10 years.
    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -Carl Sagan
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    I used to spend $5-$10 a month buying the songs, and listening to free Pandora. Music is like buying movies. Soon your collection becomes boring. And what about all the stinker movies you wish you didn't buy.

    The $1.29 per song adds up pretty quick too. I have an eclectic taste and listen to so many different genres, that it's worth it to me. A lot of the oldies are being re-recorded and updated, especially the older pop music. And you just can't find that stuff a la carte anywhere else.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by TreeTops View Post
    Are you actually paying $9.99 per month for that music? $119.88 per year. $1198.80 for 10 years.
    Compared to my booze and herb budget, that's nothing. Hahaha.
    Last edited by budwzr; 19th May 2015 at 14:40.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by TreeTops View Post
    Are you actually paying $9.99 per month for that music? $119.88 per year. $1198.80 for 10 years.
    In the "good ol days" of albums, cassette tapes, etc. you could record off the radio to your line-in on your Akai Reel-to-Reel deck, and you could edit the tape into a favorites collection.

    Then you had to buy cds and rip the tracks for your mp3 player. That was expensive. The whole CD generation was a giant money grab.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!