I really don't like hearing this ... not one bit ... at all ... My wife and I ... watch a lot of HDTV that is broadcast out of Fresno, California ...... stations broadcast on ... 18.1 .... up to 59.1 ... in our area
Webpage >>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46561405/ns/technology_and_science-wireless/#.T04ZFhRrNsd
NEW YORK — A new law could result in fewer TV stations on the air, in exchange for faster wireless data services for smartphones and tablet computers.
Before you rush out to download "Bad Teacher" from iTunes, though, keep in mind that several things need to happen over the next few years before people start seeing faster wireless speeds.
The law, part of a payrolltax package signed by President Barack Obama last week, gives the Federal Communications Commission authority to explore such an exchange. The FCC will have to write the rules for it in the coming months.
The idea is to squeeze over-the-air television, which has few viewers, into a smaller slice of the airwaves. Anything freed would be available for bidding by companies, including wireless carriers such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Wireless.
Broadcasters will need to decide whether they want to give up their frequencies. Those that do could continue to operate as cable-only channels if they don't want to go out of business. Bidding for freed airwaves likely won't begin until late 2013 or early 2014, partly to give bidders time to raise money to pay for any spectrum they win.
Although vast swaths of broadcast spectrum were freed when television signals converted from analog to digital in 2009, much of that has already been claimed. Technology companies have been clamoring for even more airwaves to satisfy growing consumer appetite for movies, books and websites on mobile devices.
About 11 million households lack cable or satellite service and get TV signals only over the air, according to Nielsen. That compares with 89 million who are cable or satellite subscribers.
There are more than 330 million devices active on cellular networks, which could benefit from the transfer of the spectrum.
The FCC envisions freeing up 500 megahertz of spectrum over the next 10 years. As much as a quarter of that could come from television.
The National Association of Broadcasters isn't sure how many stations would go along, and it's watching to make sure no broadcaster will be forced to participate. Some might have to move to a different frequency, such as from Channel 49 to Channel 19, but they would be compensated to build new towers and make other adjustments. Viewers using antennas would have to find the station's new home.
Television stations once had Channels 2 to 83, except for 37, which is used for astronomy. Channels 70 to 83, mostly used to retransmit signals from other channels, disappeared in the 1980s and have been reassigned to other uses. Stations gave up Channels 52 to 69 in 2009 as part of a transition to digital broadcasts, and much of that has already been reassigned. Depending on how many stations want to participate, Channels 31 to 51, excluding 37, could be freed up.
In the Fresno California area ... 18.1 is PBS ... 30.1 is ABC ... 47.1 is CBS .... 59.1 is CW [Ringer ... Supernatural ... Secret Circle ... Smallville when it was still on] ... and 24.1 is NBC ... and 26.1 is FOX
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
Last edited by lacywest; 29th Feb 2012 at 06:45.
-
The DTV channel numbers are virtual and may not match the actual frequency. To see how the change would affect their area, viewers would have to look at something like TVFool.com or RabbitEars.Info to see the real frequency assignments.
I don't like this change either. After checking actual frequencies, I found that 16 out of the 25 local channels I receive over-the-air would be affected. I have cable, but every time the fees go up, I think it may be time to drop it.
Local over-the-air broadcasts received via an antenna account for 70% of what I watch and record now. I recently stopped trying to view or record any of my locals from cable. Not all of them are available on cable, and some of those that are available are weak, or only available in 4:3 aspect ratio instead of the 16:9 aspect ratio broadcast over-the-air.
Similar Threads
-
fun facts about u.s. copyright law
By deadrats in forum Off topicReplies: 2Last Post: 10th Apr 2011, 19:55 -
Spain passes scary P2P law
By deadrats in forum Off topicReplies: 3Last Post: 3rd Dec 2009, 17:02 -
Law professor fires back at song-swapping lawsuits
By lgh529 in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 5Last Post: 29th Jan 2009, 22:58 -
President Signs Law Creating Copyright Czar
By drjtech in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 33Last Post: 3rd Nov 2008, 08:57 -
Proposed law for attempted copyright infringement
By TheUnknownComic in forum Off topicReplies: 1Last Post: 20th May 2007, 17:52