I'm encoding my entire DVD collection of StarTrek:TNG to x264. Unfortunately the original source of these is a hybrid interlace scan type and I having tried every possible way of deinterlacing and encoding these to Progressive with pretty poor results. The only way I have found that can put out good encoding quality on these is by turning on Interlaced Mode (TFF) within the x264 settings.
My question is what are the disadvantages or even advantages of encoding to MBAFF(interlaced). The files seem to play fine on my Plasma and PC after the encoding so why is this setting not used much for interlaced sources?
Merry Xmas and New Year
		
			+ Reply to Thread
			
		
		
		
			
	
	
				Results 1 to 5 of 5
			
		- 
	
- 
	Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
 http://www.kiva.org/about
- 
	These are the original DVD releases, not the yet to be released remastered ones! I WISH!lol. I cant wait for the new remastered ones to come out, the old DVD releases were very badly mastered indeed! - thanks for your reply edDV 
- 
	Treat the old ones as interlace. Encode interlace. Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
 http://www.kiva.org/about
- 
	
Similar Threads
- 
  How can I know if Avi is progressive or interlaced ??By apalace in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 17Last Post: 8th Feb 2012, 15:20
- 
  NTSC : progressive or interlacedBy mathmax in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 54Last Post: 2nd Feb 2012, 08:06
- 
  Progressive and Interlaced Chroma -- again!By Anonymous344 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 23rd Apr 2011, 08:14
- 
  Interlaced or progressiveBy rank in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 3rd Jul 2010, 17:41
- 
  Progressive vs Interlaced Regarding MotionBy Brent212 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 15th Jul 2009, 20:26


 
		
		 View Profile
				View Profile
			 View Forum Posts
				View Forum Posts
			 Private Message
				Private Message
			 
 
			
			

 Quote
 Quote 
			