VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    poland
    Search Comp PM
    hi,
    the original is 1080i50.

    After demuxing I got 264 video:
    Frame rate : 25.000 fps
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Interlaced
    Scan order : Top Field First

    To make explanation shorter I won't mention anything about audio in following part (just assume it's there all the tome and makes no problem).

    if I use videoRedo to mux it back (into matroska) and then I play it with mPlayer I got a msg saing it's 25 fps - and it plays fine.
    if I use mkvMerge (with default fps 25) the vido plays twice slower but mplayer again shows 25fps (when I advance frame by fame then I can count only 12 frames to make 1 second - ?)
    same story after using mp4Box (to make it into mp4) - 25 fps but twice slower speed.

    Here comes media info for resulting video:
    Frame rate : 25.000 fps
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Interlaced
    Scan order : Top Field First

    EXACTLY as the original one but plays twice slower.


    To solve this I have to enter 50fps for video source in mkvToolnix then the speed is ok and mplayer says 50fp

    media info:
    Frame rate : 50.000 fps
    Original frame rate : 25.000 fps
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Interlaced
    Scan order : Top Field First

    - looks almost the same but one line (Original frame rate : 25.000 fps)

    can somebody explain to me what is happenig here - and why videredo can make mplayer show 25fps and play it fine and the others just can't.

    Thanks.

    eta: when muxing into ts/m2ts everything is fine - only mkv and mp4 behave like above.
    Quote Quote  
  2. i50 is 50 interlaced fields per second. That's the same as 25 interlaced frames per second (the 25fps all the information programs give you). I have no idea how you or the muxers screwed up the playback speed. Maybe someone else can help with that. Why do you have to do anything with it when the original plays fine and still plays fine after the editing in VideoRedo and muxing into Matroska?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    poland
    Search Comp PM
    I have some videos that videoRedo cannot mux correctly - after some cutting (inside videoRedo) there is a short "jump" (sorry but don't know english word for this) somewere near the beginning of a video after which audio gets out of synch or the playback is totally "jumpy" - at least mpc-hc (with every possible filters combinations) cannot play this fluently (and thats my default player + mplayer) - that is the reason I was looking for other muxers.

    Why changing to matroska? - thats just mosty as an exercise to play around with videos to get some experience with it.

    Originally Posted by manono View Post
    ...I have no idea how you or the muxers screwed up the playback speed...
    belive me I did nothing - just opend gui, put 2 files inside (264 and ac3) and pressed mux - and it didn't work as should.

    I'll try to post a short part from one of my recorded videos and the "broken" one (after muxing inside videoRedo)
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    poland
    Search Comp PM
    https://forum.videohelp.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=8896&stc=1&d=1317258303
    you can download short sample from this link - there is a short "freeze" around 2-3rd sec.
    the same file can be demuxed and used inside mkvmerge or mp4box to check if after muxing it gets wrong frame rate as well.
    Image Attached Files
    • File Type: ts a.ts (9.25 MB, 304 views)
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!