VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. Member coody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Most of the PCs in the market have no Blu-ray DVD burner. But, a Blu-ray DVD player and HD video camera have become popular. How do you make a HD DVD by copy the 1080p home video (.MTS files) to a DVD disc if your PC has no Blu-ray DVD burner?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Read up on AVCHD.

    Use multiavchd or tsmuxer.

    Edit - forget about 1080p if its a long video. Down res to 720p and lower the bitrate to fit on a 8gb dual layer.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Old Dominion
    Search Comp PM
    I second MultiAVCHD, but if you want to watch the finished product on your TV a standalone home DVD player will normally not play an AVCHD disk. However, MultiAVCHD can perform an HD to SD DVD conversion. This is handy for people without a standalone Blu-ray player for AVCHD playback. (See "cons" in link below.)

    Quote Quote  
  4. Member coody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Comparing Copy a AVCHD (.MTS file) to a regular DVD disc with a regular DVD burner using such as MultiAVCHD and copy a AVCHD to a Blu-ray DVD disc directly with a Blu-ray DVD burner, will the copied AVCHD disc and Blu-ray DVD disc have the same video quality or the video on the blu-ray disc will still exceed the AVCHD disc?
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by coody View Post
    Comparing Copy a AVCHD (.MTS file) to a regular DVD disc with a regular DVD burner using such as MultiAVCHD and copy a AVCHD to a Blu-ray DVD disc directly with a Blu-ray DVD burner, will the copied AVCHD disc and Blu-ray DVD disc have the same video quality or the video on the blu-ray disc will still exceed the AVCHD disc?
    If I'm understanding what you are asking correctly, they will have the same quality . Since you copied the streams (not re-encoded) , the only difference will be capacity. A DVD5/9 won't hold as much data (so your compliation won't run as long) as compared to BD25/50 media
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member turk690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    ON, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by coody View Post
    Most of the PCs in the market have no Blu-ray DVD burner. But, a Blu-ray DVD player and HD video camera have become popular. How do you make a HD DVD by copy the 1080p home video (.MTS files) to a DVD disc if your PC has no Blu-ray DVD burner?
    This has the same theme as that which, for one, Sony does that perplexes me.
    Although it's safe to say in the HD realm AVCHD camcorders galore are currently the norm, ordinary folks who have seen, and can tell an HD show from SD are still not wont to conquer their fears of frightening things such as "AVCHD". To help provide an answer to that inevitable query "how can I get the beautiful HD video off my camcorder (before I erase them, etc)??" Sony steers decidedly non-techie Ma and Pa to invest in a stand-alone DVD-recorder (like the VRD-MC6) which get connected via USB to their, say, HDR-CX150. They then load a blank DVD+R, press a few buttons, and later out comes your handy DVD video.
    What I can't see is, why insist and push SD DVD as an ultimate destination for the AVCHD files? Why can't there be a blu-ray model which functions exactly the same but of course provides a BD video version later of the AVCHD files still in all of their glorious HD? Is that going to be an expensive thing to even ponder about? Are there difficulties with BDAV on the fly? Are the variabilities still on a level that there will be teeth-gnashing incompatibilities between a recorded BD-R and playback on any recent BD player?? Will it frighten Ma and Pa unnecessarily/even more?? Or will it give more work to a typical electronics emporium salesman?
    For the nth time, with the possible exception of certain Intel processors, I don't have/ever owned anything whose name starts with "i".
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by poisondeathray
    Since you copied the streams (not re-encoded) , the only difference will be capacity. A DVD5/9 won't hold as much data (so your compliation won't run as long) as compared to BD25/50 media
    The other difference may be some bluray players may not natively play a mts or m2ts file directly off a disc. It may need to be authored onto a disc in avchd format for it to be recognized.

    And as poisondeathray did mention if you don't reencode at all storage space is your main constraint.

    But again just like taking a mpg file and authoring a dvd you can take a mts or m2ts and author a legit bluray instead of burning the data file to bdr. Depends on what you want to do with it.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by yoda313 View Post
    The other difference may be some bluray players may not natively play a mts or m2ts file directly off a disc. It may need to be authored onto a disc in avchd format for it to be recognized.
    This is a very good point to bring up. I assumed he meant copied as in not re-encoded , but authored . No blu-ray player that I know of can play .m2ts or .mts natively without authoring - including accessory structure, folders, etc.. (i.e. they can't play it as a data disc , unlike some dvd players that can play data discs of divx or even mpeg files)
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by poisondeathray View Post
    Originally Posted by yoda313 View Post
    The other difference may be some bluray players may not natively play a mts or m2ts file directly off a disc. It may need to be authored onto a disc in avchd format for it to be recognized.
    This is a very good point to bring up. I assumed he meant copied as in not re-encoded , but authored . No blu-ray player that I know of can play .m2ts or .mts natively without authoring - including accessory structure, folders, etc.. (i.e. they can't play it as a data disc)
    Actually the ps3 can play m2ts files as just plain files. I don't know if it handles mts as I don't have any and I don't have a hd camcorder. Just thought I'd clarify that.....
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Originally Posted by yoda313 View Post
    Actually the ps3 can play m2ts files as just plain files....
    cool , I never knew that . You usually get error message with normal standalone blu-ray players
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Yep.

    In fact the last update to the hauppauge hd pvr has a setting for m2ts files and it simply says ps3 for the recording format.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member coody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by yoda313 View Post
    Read up on AVCHD.

    Use multiavchd or tsmuxer.

    Edit - forget about 1080p if its a long video. Down res to 720p and lower the bitrate to fit on a 8gb dual layer.
    I have tested the tsmuxer to try add the .mts file. It was unable to add the .MTS file. The message is "tsMuxeR not found." Can the multiavchd input the .mts file and copy to the regular DVD-/+R(HD DVD)?
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!