My specific situation in the UK
32" CRT TV -> SCART -> STB DVD Recorder -> SCART -> SKY Satellite Box OR DVB Box
DVD recorders can be set to record 1-4 hours per disc (or 1-4 hours per 4G of data if you like)
So what is the 'data rate' of a SCART (I know its not digital) so I can set my DVD recorder to record all of the data possible but put as much as possible on the disc.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
I'd suggest performing a test at the various recordings and judge the quality yourself. Standard DVD quality video is 2hr (per 4gb). Once you exceed the 2 hours, you are likely going to see a difference. The amount of difference will likely vary from recorder to recorder (based on chipset used). So testing yourself is the only way to judge if it is acceptable to you.
Google is your Friend -
I have tried 3 and 4 hours a disc and would say there is no difference, next time something is on that I already have I will try at 2 hours.
-
Don't just do your comparisons on static images. Static images are easy to see things but with mpeg2 compression they don't tell nearly the whole story.
If you have a Panasonic they will maintain full resolution (d1) up to 4hrs/disc. The problem arises when you introduce fast motion. Using 4hrs/disc with full resolution will bit starve the recorder as soon as motion is introduced.
Even though it will be harder to see you'll want to use a good source that has plenty of movement, especially something like water or confetti falling.
Look in those areas of movement, if you're using 4hrs/disc in full resolution you're bound to not like what you see. In this case it's better to lower your speed to not over 3hrs/disc and closer to SP (2hrs/disc) is better.
Most other DVDRs cut resolution at speeds above 2hrs/disc. You might not have the macroblocking but IMO the resolution looks bad.
If you do have a Panny and you want to get 4hrs/disc and really dislike macroblocking and want to trade it for resolution you could use FR set for 4hrs and a few minutes. This will force the resolution to half d1 but give you much less macroblocking. Personally I can't stand half d1 but others can't stand macroblocking. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder
Since you're recording from a analog source there is really no such thing as matching the recorder to the source. With analog more (faster speed) is always better although as you get closer to 1hr/disc the payback becomes less.
Similar Threads
-
Recording High Quality Sound on PC
By evil nemesis in forum EditingReplies: 11Last Post: 25th Feb 2012, 14:36 -
Capture Video/Audio from STB (DVB) with SCART in W7MCE through USB (EzCAP?)
By DIRKZELF in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 7Last Post: 16th Jan 2012, 18:10 -
HD Recording quality
By mrbuckenmeyer in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 7Last Post: 30th Aug 2010, 06:16 -
how to improve screen recording quality?
By George2 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 10Last Post: 21st May 2009, 21:43 -
Camtesia 6 recording for YouTube bad quality
By isabelleve in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 1Last Post: 5th Mar 2009, 14:58