VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/33549

    Why New Music Doesn't Sound As Good As It Did

    Never mind that today's factory-produced starlets and mini-clones just don't have the practiced chops of the supergroups of yesteryear, pop in a new CD and you might notice that the quality of the music itself—maybe something as simple as a snare drum hit—just doesn't sound as crisp and as clear as you're used to. Why is that?

    It's part of the music industry's quest to make music louder and louder, and it's been going on for decades, at least since the birth of the compact disc. Click the link for a nice little video, a mere 2 minutes long, which explains it in detail, with audio cues that you'll be able to hear in crisp detail.

    The key to the problem is that, in making the soft parts of a track louder (in the process making the entire track loud), you lose detail in the song: The difference between what's supposed to be loud and what's supposed to be soft becomes less and less. The result is that, sure, the soft parts of a song are nice and loud, but big noises like drum beats become muffled and fuzzy. But consumers often subconsciously equate loudness with quality, and thus, record producers pump up the volume. Anything to make a buck.

    The bigger problem is that this is all unnecessary. Stereo equipment is more powerful today than ever, and last time I checked, every piece of music hardware had a volume knob.

    Don't take my word for it: Pop in the first CD you bought and play it at the same volume level as the most recent one you bought. You might be shocked by what you hear.

    Anyone still wondering why the music business is suffering?
    1f U c4n r34d 7h1s, U r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d!!!
    Quote Quote  
  2. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    I noticed this years ago. Even CDs from just 10 years ago had the crescendo and decrescendo intact. These days, it's all set at "11 out of 10 decibels".

    Believe it or not, classic heavy metal (Metallica, Rob Zombie) has a lot of excellent music theory in it, including a nice range of loudness and tonal quality. You won't find that in Shitney Spears or Kelly Crapson.

    I never see such musical marks in metal sheet music for some reason, but they clearly exist. I could diagram some songs, if I brushed up on theory.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  3. Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    Shitney Spears or Kelly Crapson...
    ROTFLMAO
    1f U c4n r34d 7h1s, U r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d!!!
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    Shitney Spears or Kelly Crapson.
    Oh come now .. they arent that bad!! There is some legitimate talent there.

    *gulp* Oops sorry. I just threw up in my mouth as I said that.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member SquirrelDip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    I read this the other day. i don't know if I agree. I mean take an artist thats been around awhile and compare an earlier album to a current one. I think they still sound the same in terms of output.

    I have a ton of Phil Collins cd's and the earliest solo discs sound just as crisp as his last one TESTIFY.

    I bought the KILLERS cd SAMS TOWN the other month. It has very good dynamic range to it. I wouldn't say its flat at all.

    I'm not sure where they are getting this from.

    Also - a Bryan Adams album from his early stuff isn't a different presenation than Room Service from the other year.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!