http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=2634
Check out the video
Duo model is 5x faster.
http://www.joystiq.com/2006/02/28/intel-mac-mini-lacks-dedicated-graphics-hardware/
http://www.apple.com/macmini/
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
http://www.kiva.org/about -
Do we really believe Job's hype?
Apple specs have always been nothing but fodder for fanboys.
That being said, Intel based Mac mini's probably do have significantly more performance than the woefully underperforming G4 minis. However, with integrated graphics and much OSX software still running on emulation/translation through Rosetta, I somewhat suspect that the end user performance gains are probably going to be modest at most.
Now, if you could install Window XP on a Mac mini it would make a FANTASTIC cheap and reasonably well performing little PC.
Regards.Michael Tam
w: Morsels of Evidence -
Steve Job's job is to hype whatever he can. PowerPc is not particularly fast, but not really at 1/3 of Pentium.
Look deeper, we might see he is gross over the performance difference between PowerPC on old MAC OS ( based on PASCAL ) vs Intel on OS-X ( BSD unix clone ). -
Our local computer mag, APC, in it's round up last month of the top 300 events in computing had this to say about Intel based Macs
It's just like a Mac, only fast!Read my blog here.
Similar Threads
-
new intel sandy bridge chips to run up to 180watts - 23amps! toast anyone?
By aedipuss in forum ComputerReplies: 4Last Post: 15th Aug 2011, 18:16 -
New Faster Intel chips
By redwudz in forum ComputerReplies: 1Last Post: 5th May 2011, 07:16 -
Unable to download mpeg2enc for Mac intel
By its1235 in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 14Last Post: 22nd Mar 2009, 12:00 -
Intel Processor Chips
By mccoady in forum ComputerReplies: 6Last Post: 17th Sep 2008, 14:55 -
Please Intel Mac Users Take a look at this
By Man Dat Ting in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 8Last Post: 27th Nov 2007, 11:45