On the vcdhelp.com site they are talking about x264 rev 406 (jan 18 2006)
(https://www.videohelp.com/tools?tool=x264_VFW_Codec)
In the same article there is a link to the main tool site where they talk about rev 408
(http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89979)
On de mirror site, they are talking about the rev 439
(http://www.free-codecs.com/download/x264_Video_Codec.htm)
What's the difference ?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
-
http://developers.videolan.org/x264.html is the "main" site. I will fix,update the tools page more frequently when they have released a stable version.
I would only use x264 for testing for now...new releases every other day... -
Each rev means that something was submitted to the svn. Check the log to see exactly what files were updated and why.
Not all changes have a real effect though, like it could be something for OSX or in one case it was a change to the AUTHORS file. Also if you are talking about VfW, then not all features are available, so it could be something that has no effect.
Oh yeah and once again I would suggest not using the VfW encoder.
Current revision is still 439 as of now. -
Why not to use the VfW encoder ?
I've used virtualdub to encode with very very good result (better than XVID which was until X264 the best codec for me)
I also used SUPER , but the video file made with this is twice as big as with virtualdub and quality is the same !
So why advise not to use VfW ? -
1) It doesn't have all the options.
2) VfW wasn't designed to handle advanced stuff like AVC. It is a simple one frame in one frame out model which doesn't suit bframes, etc.
3) AVI isn't really designed for advanced stuff like AVC either and unlike with XviD there is no hardware compatibility to be gained by using it. So better to store natively in mp4 or mkv.
4) I stopped compiling VfW builds.
If you need more reasons, then I am sure I could come up with some, but surely the missing frames should be enough?
Size is simply bitrate * time. Twice the size, means twice the bitrate. Super is a mencoder, etc. frontend right? If so then it is using x264 same as the VfW front end.
Similar Threads
-
What is the difference between x264 AVC High@L5.1 and High@L4.1?
By Bonie81 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 9Last Post: 26th Aug 2013, 19:40 -
x264 Mediainfo to MeGUI x264 Settings
By shagratt71 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 1st Jan 2012, 04:59 -
Bitrate vs Size Calculator for x264 for ripping DVD to x264 + AC3
By Bonie81 in forum DVD RippingReplies: 7Last Post: 5th Jul 2010, 18:24 -
Color problem with x264 output + other x264 questions
By serexl in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 15th Mar 2010, 18:31 -
x264: -1920, -ESiR, -SEPTiC, -CiNEFiLE.... What are these x264 extentions?
By NWNewell in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 7Last Post: 18th May 2009, 17:10