I am test driving DivX 6 (was using 5.1 until now).
I am typically using DivX as an intermediate format during edit and feed this to CCE for MPEG2 encoding. For this purpose, I was using a constant quality setting (value = 1 for highest quality) and a Speed Setting of Fastest (didn't need motion search etc).
I am also typicaly working with interlaced video.
In trying DivX 6, I tried to configure the codec for the same settings I was using. I realized that the option to keep interlaced video goes away if the codec is tuned for fastest performance. The interlaced source option exists only if the speed setting "Balanced" (or slower) is selected.
Comparing the two codecs (5.1 vs 6) this way using VirtualDUB, version 6 seems to run twice as SLOW as version 5.1 !!
Has anyone else worked with DivX 6? Could this be a bug?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
The more I learn, the more I come to realize how little it is I know.
-
I bought divx 6 and it works just fine. Though I use the home theater mode with one pass at 1000 bitrate (for stuff I don't share on the net). The quality and speed is excellent.
It might be a bug. Have you checked divx's website for a faq or something??Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
Have you considered using AVISynth? Use trim commmands to edit and then encode with CCE.
Also you could use XviD, Quant=2, iframe only, you can decrease settings to increase speed and still have interlaced enabled. In newer versions you can just set the Quality Preset to Real Time and you should get very fast speeds. -
Originally Posted by celtic_druid
I also tried xVid. It works fine as far as encoding is concerned, is fast and good quality, however CCE won't accept XviD encoded files. It may have to do with the FOURCC code embedded in the AVI by XviD - something I need to check and perhaps experiment changing to DX50 or DIVX - so I am using DivX for some time now simply because I made CCE happy with the AVI files.
Will check the DivX site, as suggested, perhaps there is something wrong with the codec settings. If so, I will need to wait for a newer version.The more I learn, the more I come to realize how little it is I know. -
grab the latest HE-3 beta codec from www.divxlabs.com
its insanely faster than the 6.0 codec
thekid...
Similar Threads
-
Which is better for speed and performance?
By SIRCOOKS in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 20th May 2010, 22:03 -
Concerned about PC performance
By mattman1968 in forum ComputerReplies: 4Last Post: 23rd Oct 2008, 10:31 -
FFMpeg performance
By aeroliteflyer in forum DVD RippingReplies: 12Last Post: 18th Mar 2008, 19:47 -
Still Performance
By crocker5731 in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 5Last Post: 5th Dec 2007, 10:31 -
Divx vs. Xvid performance on portable player...
By abobrien in forum Portable VideoReplies: 4Last Post: 9th Aug 2007, 07:36