VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. 15th May 2005 19:31 #1
    ATimson
    ATimson is offline
    Member ATimson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Michigan, United States
    Search Comp PM
    Anybody know why TPMGEnc 3.0 is so slow at interlacing? Given the same source file, TMPGEnc 2.5 will take the same amount of time for leaving it progressive and interlacing it, while 3.0 takes a comparable amount of time to leave it progrressive and over twice as long to interlace it.

    ...why?
    Andrew Timson
    ==============
    "Niceness is the greatest human flaw, except for all the others."
    --Brendan Moody
    Quote Quote  
  2. 2nd Jun 2005 14:29 #2
    Krispy Kritter
    Krispy Kritter is offline
    Member Krispy Kritter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    St Louis, MO USA
    Search Comp PM
    Most likely a result of a change in the program itself. Not everything gets faster with a newer version.
    Google is your Friend
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!