When si minus - dual layer writers from pioneer coming out.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
does it really matter anymore? I finally broke down the other week and replaced my dvd player with one that could also handle +r discs.. (well it was a bonus, i really just wanted one that cropped PAL dvd's properly).
but I don't think its really going to matter, most devices now are being made to handle both formats.... even if -r did come out, it seems +r is giving a much better effort and would be faster. -
Dunno about -, but that 108 is coming out in august, 16x dvd (top limit for dvd & 4x Dl. retail price $179. But expect it to be discounted.
-
With the bad experiences (compatablity) people have been having with DL+R, hopefully when it is ready for release and not too early.
-
Originally Posted by 888888
In addition to compatibility problems, it might help if its release somehow coincides with the release of reasonably priced media. -
Never heard of a dvd minus burner,must be a new fangled format.People must be dashing for it over the dvd+ format.
I think,therefore i am a hamster. -
Originally Posted by tagNothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore.
-
Why does it matter? What would you expect to gain from using -R DL instead of +R DL?
Unlike -R vs. +R, -R DL will offer no improved compatibility with +R DL.
The fact that a simple twiddle of the booktype makes +R and +R DL two very compatible formats indicates that the formats themselves are good and compatible, and that the problem lies with drives and devices that just freak out when they see a booktype value that they are not expecting to see. Thus, the reason +R suffered from compatibility problems is that by the time +R came out, -R was already well-established, so more players recognized -R's booktype than +R's.
And the reason why +R DL is doing so abysmally in compatibility is because it's so new and thus even fewer players recognize the +R DL booktype... which is also the fault of those engineers designing the devices--having them freak out when an recognized booktype is encountered instead of doing something productive like defaulting to some preset--wait, some devices actually do that--and those are the ones that work with +R DL! Heh.
Well, -R DL would be even newer, which means that it will likely be even less compatible than +R DL.
Compatibility is a function of time on market, not a function of the format itself.
Similar Threads
-
Best IDE Burner for burning Dual Layer or Single Layer Discs for Duplicator
By Konfusion in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 7Last Post: 18th Nov 2011, 03:16 -
Dual Layer problem. Layer break issue...
By papegoja in forum DVD RippingReplies: 23Last Post: 9th Jun 2010, 22:52 -
Are DVD-R/DL (double layer MINUS R) incompatible with ISO/MDS for +R/DL?
By miamicanes in forum DVD RippingReplies: 16Last Post: 31st Dec 2009, 21:24 -
Dual layer disc error (2nd layer not burning properly - AVCHD)
By hhhgamewmx7 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 7Last Post: 24th Aug 2008, 09:00 -
dual layer DVD-R in single layer burner?
By snafubaby in forum MediaReplies: 5Last Post: 4th Oct 2007, 13:39