ok its almost ready, next week i will have my new pc done, and of course i will start or at least try to capture all my vhs collection to dvd, ive read, and read and i think (or hope) i got what i takes to do that... but (as always) there is a little problem i havent been able to solve... ive seen the guides posted in here about how to do the whole proces of converting vhs to dvd and for what i saw none of them are specific (yes, im slow...)
so would anyone here please tell me what should i do after i got my pc in front of me... i mean, i need a little details about what should i do first, the order of the process, capture,editing,convert,author,burn (hope its correct) i got some guides but they wont be as specifics as others, so i guess the question is, am i missing something here? (of course you idiot), well if you think you understand what i need and you have the time, then please do it but do it the babysteps way
well thxx and i hope to hear from you soon...
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19
-
-
Are you getting an upgrade to your current specs?? If not, then you'll need a dedicated capture device that turns your VHS material, into digitized information for your computer to read..
Check on the left hand side for capture cards. Most people on the forum rave about Canopus advc-100...
That was step 1):
capture,editing,convert,author,burn (hope its correct). If you get into specific problems, then write back
Good luck!!! -
Originally Posted by pijetro
bye bye take care -
You might want to consider the Canopus ADVC-100 rather than the WinTV PVR-250/350
The Canopus ADVC-100 gives you more control in the long run.
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
Originally Posted by FulciLives
-
Well the WinTV PVR capture cards can ONLY do direct to MPEG-1/MPEG-2 encoding.
So you can't do a proper multi-pass VBR software encode ... editing becomes tricky ... all sorts of "issues".
With the Canopus ADVC-100 you capture direct to DV AVI format. Editing is VERY simple. You can then do a software MPEG-1/MPEG-2 encode using filters to help clean up the image. With longer material you can do a proper multi-pass VBR encode.
In short a capture device that captures to AVI format is easier to deal with in terms of editing and cleaning up the picture not to mention you have better control of the MPEG encoding via software such as TMPGEnc or CINEMA CRAFT ENCODER aka CCE BASIC
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
Originally Posted by FulciLives
thxx for the tip -
I was going to suggest the Canopus as well, as I have one myself.
For beautiful captures with no frame loss of sync issues it has to be top of anyone's list of capture hardware.
However, if you like your life simple and don't want to worry about the finer points of encoding (or paying for the software), or would like a bit more for your money than an anolgue to digital converter, then maybe a Hauppauge would suite you more - you could use it to capture vide to mpeg1 or mpeg2 when needed and use it to watch TV on your PC if you want to when you're not capturing.
It all depends on how much you plan on capturing - if it's just for a few items then I'd consider something that you could also use afterwards. If you plan on capturing a lot and doing all the learning that goes with editing and authoring, then I'd go for the Canopus.Regards,
Rob -
Originally Posted by rhegedus
Do you agree?
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
I don't recall disagreeing -I just gave an honest view of the pros and cons of each piece of hardware.
The choice depends on how big the collection is, wouldn't you agree?Regards,
Rob -
I have had my Canopus ADVC for about a year and am well pleased with it. As said above, I recommend using a capture program such as WinDV to get AVI files and then work on them from there. The output will depend on the software you use to covert the AVI files to DVD. I have found that generally speed and quality don't go together. Nyah Levi
-
@cesarin:
There is no one "right" answer to your question. There are many alternatives for you to choose from, depending on how much fine control you want over the process. IMO if you want simple hassle-free conversion of any analog video source to DVD format, use a standalone DVD recorerder. The Daytek unit costs no more than the Canopus ADVC-100, and judging from some of the posts on other threads here, does a fine job.
OTOH if you want fine control of all stages of the process, fancy editing, cutting, picking chapter points etc. go with the AVD DV capture option, but be prepared to do a lot of learning and spend a lot of time doing it.
In any case, this forum will likely prove invaluable to you.
In summary: first ask yourself this question (and make sure you get an answer) : How much do I want to trade off ease of use for elaborate control?
-
Originally Posted by rhegedus
That's all
- John "FulciLives" Coleman"The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
-
Fulcilives wrote:
I just wanted someone else to agree with me that with VHS it is probably bettre to use the Canopus ADVC-100 than a direct to MPEG capture solution.
That's why the ADVC-100 is so good. Most editing softwares work with the DV format that this capture card spits out, therefore you can create imaginative clips. Unfortunately, if you go the MPEG capture route, this is much more difficult, if not impossible....
Good luck!!! -
Originally Posted by FulciLives
I'm just a bit hesitant to recommend a £250 (I paid this about 18 months ago and prices haven't dropped) piece of kit that may not be used much more than a few dozen times.
I agree that for editing purposes, DV whups mpeg - no contest. But since this would be just for VHS capture, there isn't much editing involved, mpeg would do - just set the bit-rate according to the length of the film and capture. Trimming the start and finish should be easy. This is, after all, what all AIW capture card users do.
If your planning on using the ADVC long-term, £ for £ you won't find a better piece of kit to capture VHS.Regards,
Rob -
well guys thank you very much to all of you for the help and tips, now i find myself centered and i think i know what i want, i wont go for the external device becasue i find it expensive for the task i want, i am perfeccionist but in this case i am on a new level of high tech... maybe if i learn how to do this and with very good results i could use some money to get the external device (forgot the name), but for the moment ill go with a not so expensive card... but it was really really helpful all you wrote i hope we could keep a contac beyond this forum, and dont worry first problem i got... youll be the firsts to know it...
ps: if i succed (wich i hope) you will also know!!!
thanks again to all...
Similar Threads
-
Possible to convert ONLY audio part of WMV, but not the video part?
By tigerb in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 27th Jun 2011, 18:57 -
how can i edit a small part inside a movie and make that part look bigger?
By xxquatroxx in forum EditingReplies: 1Last Post: 24th May 2010, 15:32 -
Want part of DVD to one file
By neworldman in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 30th Apr 2010, 18:38 -
TMPGEnc cannot open the video part of the file, only the audio part can.
By dzsoul in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 15Last Post: 3rd Apr 2009, 08:36 -
How to cut out a part from DVD?
By DjuKa in forum EditingReplies: 8Last Post: 23rd Oct 2008, 11:03