Should a file (same length, video data, etc) with 192 kbps audio be significantly smaller than one w/ 224 kbps?
should it be this close?
203,931 KB vs. 204,220 KB
[192] [224]
Encoded w/ Tmpgenc
Im tryin to fit more w/ 192 kbps, but this is hardly making a diff.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-
audio vs video 1:9 so cutting the video data rate will have a much greater effect.
Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons. -
If the clip is 9 seconds long, thats right.
192kbp-224kbs=-32kbps
-32kbs * (length of clip in seconds) = how much smaller it should be.Ejoc's CVD Page:
DVDDecrypter -> DVD2AVI -> Vobsub -> AVISynth -> TMPGEnc -> VCDEasy
DVD:
DVDShrink -> RecordNow DX
Capture:
VirualDub -> AVISynth -> QuEnc -> ffmpeggui -> TMPGEnc DVD Author -
well the clip is actually not 9 sec
its 23m 50s !! =)
i dont no why it isnt much smaller than the 224kbps one... -
The TMPGenc audio encoder totally sux - I dunno, it always makes really huge audio file saizes.... if you know how too use it, try besweet or headac3he or somethin. I find that those programs do a good job at making small files with really good quality (also a lot faster than tmpgenc - will save you video encoding time and give you better results).
-
Similar Threads
-
DTS 15xx kbps to DTS 768 kbps and tsMuxeR question.
By Jared_ in forum AudioReplies: 0Last Post: 1st Jun 2009, 09:46 -
128 kbps to 96 kbps MP3 - big difference?
By joshua4 in forum AudioReplies: 12Last Post: 24th Oct 2008, 14:11 -
why 320 kbps mp3 have less vol compare to 128 kbps files?
By sumeshkri in forum AudioReplies: 4Last Post: 27th Sep 2008, 07:57 -
iPod classic limit for AAC NOT 160 kbps! Supports 320 kbps!
By FallenAngelII in forum AudioReplies: 1Last Post: 29th Dec 2007, 12:14 -
Convert .ac3 (384 Kbps) to Dolby 5.1 (448 Kbps) ????
By christopheramos in forum AudioReplies: 6Last Post: 11th Jul 2007, 00:35