VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Should a file (same length, video data, etc) with 192 kbps audio be significantly smaller than one w/ 224 kbps?

    should it be this close?

    203,931 KB vs. 204,220 KB
    [192] [224]

    Encoded w/ Tmpgenc

    Im tryin to fit more w/ 192 kbps, but this is hardly making a diff.
    Quote Quote  
  2. audio vs video 1:9 so cutting the video data rate will have a much greater effect.
    Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
    The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons.
    Quote Quote  
  3. If the clip is 9 seconds long, thats right.

    192kbp-224kbs=-32kbps

    -32kbs * (length of clip in seconds) = how much smaller it should be.
    Ejoc's CVD Page:
    DVDDecrypter -> DVD2AVI -> Vobsub -> AVISynth -> TMPGEnc -> VCDEasy

    DVD:
    DVDShrink -> RecordNow DX

    Capture:
    VirualDub -> AVISynth -> QuEnc -> ffmpeggui -> TMPGEnc DVD Author
    Quote Quote  
  4. well the clip is actually not 9 sec

    its 23m 50s !! =)

    i dont no why it isnt much smaller than the 224kbps one...
    Quote Quote  
  5. The TMPGenc audio encoder totally sux - I dunno, it always makes really huge audio file saizes.... if you know how too use it, try besweet or headac3he or somethin. I find that those programs do a good job at making small files with really good quality (also a lot faster than tmpgenc - will save you video encoding time and give you better results).
    Quote Quote  
  6. ok im gonna try toolame as an external encoder option in tmpgenc
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!