VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Search Comp PM
    I have two scenarios based on this question:
    1. A deinterlaced video with the original frame rate vs a deinterlaced video with twice the original frame rate.
    2. A 480p video or lower upscaled into a 1080p video vs a 1080i video deinterlaced into a 1080p video.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Search PM
    Depends on the effective rate of the program.

    Don't you have at least four scenarios here?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Originally Posted by Jay123210599 View Post
    I have two scenarios based on this question:
    1. A deinterlaced video with the original frame rate vs a deinterlaced video with twice the original frame rate.
    2. A 480p video or lower upscaled into a 1080p video vs a 1080i video deinterlaced into a 1080p video.

    It depends on other factors as well -

    The bitrate and encoder type and settings used

    The deinterlacing algorithm used

    The upscaling algorithm used

    and how you are defining "quality"
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    In addition to the above, double rate deinterlacing maintains the full motion fluidity of the interlaced file.
    Many things to consider ...
    Quote Quote  
  5. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Search Comp PM
    All right, I use QTGMC for deinterlacing and Topaz Video AI for upscaling. What's the answer now?
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    You deinterlace with qtgmc and then upscale the result with Topaz?
    Can you post some samples?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by Jay123210599 View Post
    I have two scenarios based on this question:
    1. A deinterlaced video with the original frame rate vs a deinterlaced video with twice the original frame rate.
    2. A 480p video or lower upscaled into a 1080p video vs a 1080i video deinterlaced into a 1080p video.

    1) One way of thinking of it is single rate deinterlaced, original framerate means you discard 50% of the information . So at maximum it's half "quality" by one definition, since you only have half the temporal samples . That doesn't necessarily indicate anything about the per field spatial quality (or per frame spatial quality)

    At a given limited bitrate, the single rate deinterlaced file may have higher spatial quality, because it has 1/2 the frames. If you use adequate bitrate and encoder settings, then it's a non issue

    2)Also depends on the "480p or lower " quality and "1080i" quality you are starting with .


    This is assuming your 1080i are actually interlaced content. If it's progressive content you should be field matching
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!