VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 1st May 2002 03:57 #1
    hendo358
    hendo358 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Search Comp PM
    Send a message via AIM to hendo358 Send a message via Yahoo to hendo358
    Given that your system is fast enough, is capturing Uncompressed AVI better at saving quality than using the Huffy codec, when encoding to VCD?
    Quote Quote  
  2. 1st May 2002 04:09 #2
    thxkid
    thxkid is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Search Comp PM
    My best looking Music Video's on VCD or SVCD come out when using Uncompressed AVI, have tried Huffy and Indeo all 3 look good but the edge goes to uncompressed AVI, which by the way at a 4 minute Video at 480x480 is about 3 to 3.4 gigs in size.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 1st May 2002 04:33 #3
    Dave B
    Dave B is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    England
    Search Comp PM
    If your system is fast enough to encode to HuffyUV at the required resolution then there is no need to capture as an uncompressed AVI.

    HuffyUV is a lossless codec (unlike MJPEG, MPEG, DivX etc) so it produces video IDENTICAL to an uncompressed avi.

    The only downside is that it takes significantly longer to reencode a Huffy source than an uncompressed.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!