Man Sucked!

[zzyzzx]

Man Sucked Into Plane Engine at Airport
April 18, 2002 8:50 am EST

TOKYO (Reuters) - A man died after being sucked into the engine of an Air China aircraft at Kansai airport in western Japan Thursday and police said it may have been suicide.

Police said colleagues saw Zhang Xinmin, a 39-year old Chinese member of the airline's maintenance staff, chase after the Boeing 767 as it began to taxi toward the runway for take-off.

"It is possible he may have committed suicide, or he may have been running toward the engine for some other reason and was sucked in. We are investigating both possibilities," said a spokesman for the airport police.

The plane had been scheduled to fly to Beijing with 218 passengers and crew on board.

[devinemi83]

Man, I feel sorry for the person who had to clean that engine out.

[Sefy]

Well, that's an interesting way to die, maybe he was hitchhiking the place ?
"Look... Wendy... I can Flyyyyyy tttzzzzzzzzz"

[wellmashed]

Wonder if he went head or feet first..........

What would you rather do?????

Personally it'd have to be head first...

Imagine the split second or so watching yourself get sliced like a cucumber in a multi slicer...........

[Sefy]

Personaly i'd like to be under a sleeping drug at the time

[zzyzzx]

Wonder if he went head or feet first..........

I'm not sure if it was head first of maybe arms first buy my guess is head first. I'm thinking that here was either sucked in quickly (by head) or got close and was trying tp push away with his hands wne his head got sucked in. Think about it.

[wellmashed]

Wonder if he went head or feet first..........

I'm not sure if it was head first of maybe arms first buy my guess is head first. I'm thinking that here was either sucked in quickly (by head) or got close and was trying tp push away with his hands wne his head got sucked in. Think about it.

I was joking m8.........

It's quite obvious he would have gone head first given the height of where the engine would have been....

But just imagine going feet first....

And trying to stop yourself.........

[bilbogod]

This little clip should show you all how this kinda stuff happens :-

http://www.whocutthecheez.com/Multimedia/videos/suckplane.mpeg

and just in case you can't get enough of this kind of stuff here's some more visual treats

http://www.whocutthecheez.com/Multimedia/videos/woops.htm

[bilbogod]

Dammit quality is not very good. I think someone has encoded it in svcd-x

[wellmashed]

Dammit quality is not very good. I think someone has encoded it in svcd-x

Wasn't trying to fit it all onto a milk bottle top was he???????????

Jeeeeeez.......Some people...........

[Ali G WiKiT]

???

SVCD-X blows kwags compression scheme out of the water and compatibility.

svcd-x is strictly standard, more compatible, newly revised once again, encoding times way faster now, compression scheme quality vs kwags is better due to kwags compresion seems to be too much, audio never possible to go out of sync, and matches those of movie groups as to which I work with.

Forget fighting as my main mate has told me.
I know from experience and i have tried kwags, good for beginners, quality, not for the advanced!

[zzyzzx]

Wow! I guess you really do get sucked in head first!

[wellmashed]

Yeah.....

I had a look at it and at least it's pretty quick!!!!

[bilbogod]

Ali G Wikit or should I say Sean as is patently obvious from the threat that I received in my p/messages this afternoon..... Welcome back to the forums. May I extend you the courtesy of sparing you from the onslaught of derision thats sure to follow your exposure....... I have enclosed a little copy of your p.m. for all to see......
You cite ShiZZZon as some kind of God like authority from which we can all acknowledge pearls of wisdom....
Just a quickie....who are you trying to kid ????

svcd-x is strictly standard, more compatible, newly revised once again, encoding times way faster now, compression scheme quality vs kwags is better due to kwags compresion seems to be too much, audio never possible to go out of sync, and matches those of movie groups as to which I work with.

Please enlighten us as to when SVCD-X became standard or perhaps more importantly "A Standard". This means that your template is 1150kbp/s cbr??? How then do you propose to fit 120 mins of it on 1 cd. Perhaps you know something that we don't......

Forget fighting as my main mate has told me.

Is that why you send me a pathetic whining message, a copy of which I have posted below......

From: Ali G WiKiT
To: bilbogod
Posted: Apr 23 12:30
Subject: **** off
We are always watching you and comments of ShiZZZoN are not welcome here anymore

Dude, when you gather together the intelligence to insult me effectively, try inputting that energy into correcting the glaring flaws in your punctuation and grammar. Perhaps that way you wont betray your identity so easily. Finally you could always try maintaining a civil tone, providing sensible replies and earning the respect of at least one real person on this forum.
But then again the alternative is always more fun. Welcome Back !!!!

[d4n13l]

???

SVCD-X blows kwags compression scheme out of the water and compatibility.

svcd-x is strictly standard, more compatible, newly revised once again, encoding times way faster now, compression scheme quality vs kwags is better due to kwags compresion seems to be too much, audio never possible to go out of sync, and matches those of movie groups as to which I work with.

Forget fighting as my main mate has told me.
I know from experience and i have tried kwags, good for beginners, quality, not for the advanced!

"Ali G WiKiT"®, comes straight to you courtesy of Kentucky Community and Technical College.
("Ali G WiKiT"® is a registered trade name of ShiZZZon®, however anyone stating this will be subject to idiotic threats, almost certainly originating from Kentucky, US).
LOL, Sean, you fool no one. So, clown, continue to play the goat; you are at least getting more convincing when you assume other identities.

PS
Please feel free to threaten me. Its funny.