Hi,
Let's say I need to reencode a HEVC video because my TV only supports H.264.
Or maybe it only supports bitrates up to 20 Mbit/s, while my original file is 60 Mbit/s...
Quality-wise, would it help if I slightly downsample the video just before the recompression? E.g. to 94% of the original size?
My line of thinking is that it would move a little bit boundaries between the macroblocks,
so the second compression would not amplify artifacts at these coordinates...
especially that it would use less bitrate / less effective codec.
What do you think?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
-
Downscaling is one of hte best ways to decrease bit rate while maintaing good quality. But if you're going to lower the bit rate to the point where the video file will be at most 1/3 of the original's size I don't think downscaling it to 94% is going to make a bit of difference. Downscale it a lot more, and remember ANY re encoding is going to lose some quality.
Similar Threads
-
Bitrate is lower than expected after conversion
By pdun459 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 8Last Post: 21st Sep 2016, 19:59 -
Does it make any sense to use a higher bitrate when the original is lower?
By -Alex- in forum Video ConversionReplies: 20Last Post: 7th Aug 2015, 23:05 -
Better quality at same bitrate: higher vs. lower resolution?
By pxstein in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 18th Mar 2015, 03:24 -
3D m2ts file from tsmuxer but need prog to lower bitrate
By pjvader in forum Authoring (Blu-ray)Replies: 5Last Post: 27th Apr 2014, 17:35 -
How does my system downsample video data?
By mamoltub in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 25th Apr 2012, 06:37