I have a short 720 x 576 interlaced video here. This is my script which works fine. I can use the same script but with the numbers changed to convert NTSC to PAL and the PAL conversion looks practically identical to the NTSC original. However the reverse is not true. When using the same script to convert PAL to NTSC I notice that the picture quality is noticeably lower and the framerate looks blurry & weird. Is there any way to get a better quality PAL to NTSC conversion with regards to the picture quality and framerate?
Code:McTemporalDenoise(settings="medium", interlaced=true) AssumeTFF() QTGMC(Preset="Super Fast") Lanczos4Resize(720,480) ConvertFPS(59.94) SeparateFields() SelectEvery(4,0,3) Weave()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
-
-
Whatever you want to call it, it gives a jerky framerate. I don't know why anyone would want to use that.
-
First you say it plays in slow motion. But it's the exact same length as your source MPG so what you said is clearly wrong. Earlier you said your script made it blurry. And that's because you used ConvertFPS. I explained how to make it sharper. You can't have it both ways, as there's no ideal way to convert interlaced PAL to interlaced NTSC. Yes, there are duplicate fields/frames added to go from a bobbed 50fps to a bobbed 59.94fps. Then you reinterlace it. Me, I'll take the ChangeFPS way any day of the week.
I don't know why anyone would want to use that.Last edited by manono; 10th Jun 2013 at 19:12.
-
Post your resulting file. I suspect you did something wrong.
You could try SmoothFPS2(60000,1001) from this post:
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/345774-How-to-convert-from-60fps-to-25fps-to-get-co...=1#post2159173Last edited by jagabo; 10th Jun 2013 at 23:41.
-
Here's the resulting file where I used ChangeFPS. This is my script:
Code:McTemporalDenoise(settings="medium", interlaced=true) AssumeTFF() QTGMC(Preset="Super Fast") Lanczos4Resize(720,480) ChangeFPS(59.94) SeparateFields() SelectEvery(4,0,3) Weave()
Last edited by VideoFanatic; 11th Jun 2013 at 06:12.
-
You did the conversion correctly. I wonder if there's something odd about the way your media player or TV displays it. To me, ChangeFPS() looks a little better than ConvertFPS() when going from 25i to 30i. It's a little more jerky but you don't get those weird phasing effects caused by blended fields/frames.
By the way, if you're making h.264 video, why don't you leave it 59.94 fps progressive? Can your player not handle it?
Did you try SmoothFPS()? It's the smoothest of all. But you get odd distortions now and then. -
Hi, this conversation is a little over my head (I've never gotten QTGMC to work) but I'm trying to learn something here.
Everybody is taking into account that the source tape comes from an NTSC broadcast converted to PAL by Sky before you ever got your hands on it, right? Is a "good" conversion back to NTSC really possible? -
SmoothFPS requires some other code doesn't it as I used SmoothFPS(59.94) on it's own and it gave an error message. I'm not sure what else is needed.
You are correct about my media player. For some reason it plays ChangeFPS content with a really jerky framerate. I burned to a Bluray and it was fine although it was still slightly jerky. I still prefer ConvertFPS as ChangeFPS gives me motion sickness when I watch it. The picture quality on both was so similar I couldn't really tell them apart.
Similar Threads
-
PAL / NTSC DVD Conversion (patch method)
By DJRumpy in forum User guidesReplies: 271Last Post: 12th Mar 2020, 18:13 -
Framserving in Avisynth with Virtualdub (Pal to NTSC Conversion)
By nicksteel in forum Video ConversionReplies: 28Last Post: 22nd Jul 2012, 12:36 -
Simple click and go method to convert PAL to NTSC
By THRobinson in forum Video ConversionReplies: 15Last Post: 26th Feb 2011, 00:16 -
PAL to NTSC Picture Quality?
By Mike99 in forum DVD & Blu-ray PlayersReplies: 4Last Post: 13th Aug 2010, 04:28 -
Best Method Convert PAL VOBs to NTSC
By ehmjay in forum MacReplies: 13Last Post: 28th Jul 2009, 15:54