My question is this. I have a project in Premiere 6. My clips were captured at 320x240 with component video codec (my only option). I'm going to make a SVCD which is obviously 480x480. So should I render the entire project at 480x480 so the conversion to mpeg2 would be faster/better or should I render at 640x480 (or larger) in order to get a higher data rate for the mpeg2 encoder to work with? I know my video clips won't get any better (will they?) but I'm concerned with the quality of other things like text rendering and other effects.
Also should export with no compression at all? Millions+ colors?
Oh and another thing. If I could, would it be better to capture and edit my movie at 480x480 knowing my target is a SVCD?
Any input would help a lot........... Thanks!
Bri
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
-
Encoding to MPEG2 at SVCD resolution starting with a source that has only 240 lines of resolution will result in disastrous picture quality. If at all possible, always capture with a minimum 480 lines of resolution. That way your source will reach the minimum spec for DVD, and can be transcoded to any popular digital format with acceptable quality.
Similar Threads
-
What is better to render with?
By ingeborgdot in forum EditingReplies: 8Last Post: 11th Sep 2011, 12:10 -
Best Vegas Movie HD 10 render settings for Flip UltraHD?
By s-one in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 8th Mar 2011, 18:58 -
Vegas Movie Studio HD 9.0 + x264vfw failed to render
By shun in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 20th Jul 2010, 07:03 -
sync without render?
By mrjoetoff in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 23rd Aug 2009, 10:04 -
SVCD converted movie with choppy playback at the end on stand-alone player
By supernano in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 27th Oct 2007, 10:10