What encoder has better quality? and what encoder is faster?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 24 of 24
-
Hi,
CCE has better quality and is faster than TMPGenc. Only downside is that CCE SP cost $3980 (!!!!!!)
Look here:
http://www.vcdhelp.com/comparison.htm
For a comparison of some encoders.
Greetz,
pSyChO dAdThe difference between genius and insanity is only measured by success ! -
cost...LOL, if you know anything about using the internet, CCE cost you nothing.
-
You can't leach for the rest of your life. If CCE doesn't make some money what do you think you gonna leach next time?
-
errrm so Jestorius, please show us how you purchased CCE by posting your serial number here... U know.. "Put up or shut up" !!
-
Sorry , I don't have it and I don't use it.
"cost...LOL, if you know anything about using the internet, CCE cost you nothing."
You can't post something like this here!!!! -
Originally Posted by Jestorius
And Im sure your a little goody two shoes that pays for everything and has never used a keygen or crack. Or have never captured or encoded anything that happens to be pirated. -
You can't post something like this here!!!!
You can't leach for the rest of your life. If CCE doesn't make some money what do you think you gonna leach next time? -
Wrong. Those comparisons of those encoders r of older versions Not the latest... Which TMPGenc has gone many new revisions with speed, quality and accuracy in coversions. also, TMPGenc added a tiny bit more bitrate 2 the video that were used for comparison over CCE. Yes CCE were rated better for producing less blockyness but $4,000.00 is ridiculous and if your going 2 pay that much just 4 what very unoticable difference in quality CCE has over TMPGenc (which is free, Pro is like $40 bucks) then either your releated 2 Bill Gates or a complete moron.
I would just download the damm thing off the net 4 free.
I have TMPGenc Pro 2.5 and my VCD Encoding results r Xellent. Deffinatly would rival Studio Production released VCDs and probably produce better quality then that $4,000 Crap
Originally Posted by Psycho_Dad_RulesComputers -
Kdiddy, cybermage26 - shut the f*ck up , you never get it , someone has to pay for it. I don't give a flying f*ck if you leach or not .
CCE costs ~1970$ - new price. The plugin is ca. 250,-
Tmpgenc is ~48$.
Are you going to pay for Tmpgenc, Kdiddy? I guess not. So shut up, don't come here telling me it's free just because you have a 14.4 modem ...
So back to the subject. The new Tmpgenc plus can give you the same quality as CCE . -
CCE is in terms of video quality only a slightly bit better than TMPGEnc, so it is not worth the high price if you consider that TMPGEnc Plus costs less than 50 Dollars. Nevertheless, in terms of speed TMPGEnc sucks big time. Even so my machine is well equipped a two hour movie encoding takes a good ten hours, if not more whereas CCE manages to do the same at up to 1.5 times real time.
SiCN - the real one!
"Dudes, we gotta think here... What would Brian Boitano do?" -
CCE is the best solution for avi to mpeg 2 encoding.
Isn't easy to use and costs a lot. You can't batch encode easy. For DVB to SVCD or D2/DVD conversion, the quality results are identical as with TMPGenc plus, using the new 2 pass vbr.
About the encoding time:
TMPGenc is now optimised for athlon XP and basicly P4. With older athlons and p3, remains slow.
Using the new 2 pass vbr of TMPGenc plus (highest quality mode) VS the 3 pass VBR of cinemacraft, you get identical results. No blocks anymore for tmpgenc, amazing picture.
If you set TMPGenc to Motion estimate search mode and the new 2 pass vbr, you get quality better CCE's 2 Pass and slighty worst 3 Pass VBR.
CCE's 3 Pass need the same time to encode as 2 Pass VBR of TMPGenc in motion estimate mode.
From this point of view, TMPGenc ain't slow anymore.
Only when you use older CPUs, CCE remains the solution for speed....
Overall, CCE is better TMPGenc. Not THAT better, but better. Remember also, that CCE is overpriced and difficult to use.
That Is My Opininion. Other users may have other... -
Kdiddy, cybermage26 - shut the f*ck up , you never get it , someone has to pay for it. I don't give a flying f*ck if you leach or not .
-
Jestorius, did you ever actually buy that copy of Windows you're using or is it the cracked one that most computer shops release with their PC's??
asta la vista baby! -
Originally Posted by Kdiddy
-
As I sad, I don't give a flying f*uck abouth your leaching but don't come here and brag how genius leacher you are and these guyes who is offering day and night to develop something good they are just idiots because you can leach it free. If your problem is the overpricing , just ansver this: Did you give something to Avisynth or Tmpgenc guy, nothing??? Why, is it overpriced or what? Or just because it costs something? As much as a Coce and something, aren't you just a mother f*cker leacher, don't fu*cking come here and brag your a$$hole.
-
Just to get back to the subject for a moment - CCE is actually a bit easier to batch than TMPGEnc - TMPGEnc you have to set up project files, then load them into the batch handler - for CCE, just keep draggin more AVIs to the window. When they're all ready, just hit the encode button.
-
As I sad, I don't give a flying f*uck abouth your leaching but don't come here and brag how genius leacher you are and these guyes who is offering day and night to develop something good they are just idiots because you can leach it free. If your problem is the overpricing , just ansver this: Did you give something to Avisynth or Tmpgenc guy, nothing??? Why, is it overpriced or what? Or just because it costs something? As much as a Coce and something, aren't you just a mother f*cker leacher, don't fu*cking come here and brag your a$$hole.
CCE is faster & better encoder mpeg-2 than TMPG period. -
Because the owner of this forum is actually paying for at you and me can have a forum. So don't come with your statemen of free leaching. It can demage alot.
Just read the nfo file next time you leach something. -
just go away & suck ya thumb...please dont give me this holier than though crap about what goes on in these forums.....many cracks, hacks, & etc. get discussed in this forum. I never said exactly WHERE/HOW to get the crack, I just said it is possible, so again, chill out & grow up.
-
please stick to the topic....make a new post if you wanna discuss if it is okey to crack apps or not.
-
To my friends talking for warez...
Goooooooooooooooooooooogle
Does that say something to you?
It is an acceptable way to answer for that stuff
@VidGuy: When you use avis and only avis, yes, then CCE is more easy to batch encode.
But try do that with DVB material, or mpeg files in general?
Just realise:
There are 3 ways to grabb today:
1. Avi
2. Realtime mpeg
3. DVB transmissions
Also, there are those downloaded movies (asf, divx, etc...). You can easily understand that the users talking about them, come from US...
For avi and divx/asf conversion to vcd/svcd, then maybe CCE is better in terms of quality/time. Also, maybe it is easier.
But for DVB/MPEG to VCD/SVCD convertion, TMPGenc is much much better and easier.
For DVD to VCD/SVCD convertion, I believe CCE and TMPGenc are equal. CCE's 3 pass VBR and TMPGenc's new 2 Pass VBR (on motion estimate search mode) produces alsmost the same quality at the same time if you have new generation CPUs. CCE is about 5% better in quality. Not big deal for me...
Similar Threads
-
TMPGEnc to License x264 Encoder for TMPGEnc 4.0 XPress
By poisondeathray in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 17Last Post: 28th Jan 2011, 15:07 -
tmpgenc 4 audio no AAC encoder?
By sychern in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 22nd Jun 2009, 21:06 -
Cinemacraft Encoder..Black void after encode
By Soixante in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 28th May 2008, 03:43 -
Tmpgenc problems with divx avi's, encoder suggestions?
By kitykat_2004 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 26th May 2008, 01:35 -
Better encoder than TMPGEnc
By dazza555 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 7Last Post: 15th Sep 2007, 09:45