b. possible bug. When outputting to MPEG2 Transport stream, often the program seems to abort the task at various intervals with no error at all. In the past I got a load of warnings about buffer underflow.
Any help at all appreciated
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 23 of 23
-
-
I am using a slightly older version (will check version number when I get home) and use it to edit transport streams (HD and SD) and DVD output, and have no performance issues when scrolling along the timeline or playing back video, and no output issues.
Combining this with your Vegas issues in your other post, I would be looking at something more systemic either with your codecs, your HDDs, or your source footage.Read my blog here.
-
Surely videoredo uses its own decoder....I would be amazed if it used external decoders. Same with vegas, that certainly uses its own decoders.
So that seems unlikely. As for source data, it is DVD. Every single dvd has this issue. So maybe it is anydvd which is the issue? As it is decoding on the fly....
But another editor I used didn't seem to have any scrolling issues... -
Do you have the DVD in the DVD reader or on the HD? You should rip it to the HD because you will be I/O bound by the DVD reader, and seeking/scrubbing will be slow
-
yeah I was a bit stumped by the fact another cutter had no issue but you are right. This is because I am using DVD and anydvd. That is the issue here. So case closed on that front.
Now the otehr issue is buffer underflows and anomalies when using the transport stream :P -
What settings are optimal in videredo...especially when dealing with DVD.
I see options here and I haven't the foggiest what they mean....
output PAT and PMT packets (seems more like a female issue lol)
PIDS, nullpackets, and mux rate....
What do these do and should I alter them? -
It's possible your I/O issues might be contributing to the transport stream export issues
The 3.1.5 changelog has quite a few transport stream fixes , consider upgrading
https://www.videohelp.com/tools/VideoReDo/version-history#changelog -
external usb hard drives are not as fast or consistent as internal drives, anything else using usb can interrupt them. buffer underruns could be a result.
-
Try Drive M or N...i.e. not your Windows system drive
Try unistalling/reinstalling or upgrade, maybe you have a corrupt install ?
Seeking should be quick for a standard DVD, it might be a bit slower for 1080p material, and your PC specs look ok
Do you have other processes in the background eating CPU cycles? e.g. virus scan, defragging HD, adware, viruses..etc... check task manager -
I can assure you that the issue I had has nothing to do with harddrives or specs or installations. It is simply anydvd in use with videoredo. They do not like one another. Anydvd decodes dvd on the fly and DVD is not as fast as a harddrive.
The problem is that videoredo seems to handle the data it gets from anydvd very slowly. It is doing more than it needs to at the playback point.
Other editors handle the data very well but videoredo does not like DVD and anydvd at all.
If anyone out there has an encrypted movie dvd and anydvd and videoredo they could also try this and I think they would find much the same issue -
Then rip it with DVDFab
DVDFab HD Decrypter is the free version
I disagree with your observation - I have anydvd + videoredo, it's not that slow. I think it's something wrong with your setup or user error -
Originally Posted by minidv2dvd
Anyway, I know that there is no fix for this pointThe problem I have now is the transport stream options. What are optimal settings?
-
Ripping a self recorded single-layer DVD +RW with DVD Decryptor takes between 6 and 9 minutes on my system and I've just tried ripping a dual-layer commercial encrypted DVD with DVDFab HD Decryptor and it took less than 20 mins. Hardly "a considerably large amount of time", and if it works . . .
Just as a matter of interest, why are you posting VRD questions here rather than at VRD's own forum where you can communicate with other VRD users and the developers? -
I have posted there too in the past, got little feedback. I spoke to the developers who told me there was no problem....
Any case, there is a wealth of know;edge here. It is like asking why don't sony vegas users send messages on sony board or premiere uses report things to adobe.
people here will certainly know what mux rates are and what is optimal for DVD. What are PITS and PMT packets etc -
Originally Posted by seifer almasy
you might try dragging the video_ts folder to the hard drive with anydvd running. it should only take about 5 minutes for a dvd5. put it on c: and then use the other drive as the destination drive for videoredo. things will definitely go faster and save time for the entire project. -
the mux rate and other options of a .ts is should only be changed if you need a specific rate and packet types for it to be broadcast over the air from a tv station. for consumer use it shouldn't even be there. everything in the transport stream options page should have a check mark and the ouput mux rate should be set to automatic.
-
Originally Posted by seifer almasy
Hope you find a solution that satisfies you. -
Originally Posted by minidv2dvd
1 last thing. What is PAt PMT interval? The default is 100 ms. What is the merit in it being 100 and is there any reason to change?
Similar Threads
-
Any free apps that will join m2ts files without much hassle?
By AndyD in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 21st May 2011, 11:34 -
VideoRedo TV suite 4
By nirbhayn in forum EditingReplies: 0Last Post: 19th Jan 2011, 15:56 -
videoRedo Plus
By natty in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 14th Jun 2008, 09:38 -
VideoRedo->DVRMS Issue, VideoRedo->MPEG2 Fine, Please Help
By tbrnet in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 10th Jan 2008, 16:43 -
File Association hassle factor
By ahhaa in forum ComputerReplies: 2Last Post: 26th Aug 2007, 22:25