I have had hit and miss results using the 2. Decoding avi to vcd takes an hour or two for a 100Mb file. This is very time consuming and frustrating especcially if the VCD comes ot with naff sound/jumpy video or doesn't work at all.
I'm new at this and are in the middle of downloading the DivX to VCD All-In-One Guide from this site using VirtualDub, TMPGEnc and VCDEasy.
Is this better and quicker? Is decoding a time consuming job with whatever you use?
Daz
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
-
Yes, encoding is a time-consuming process, basically a function of your CPU and of the compression ratio.
Just a quick one: a method that yields good and quick results is to use VirtualDUB and frameserve to TMPGENC.
The other day, I was resizing in VDUB, adding subtitles and resampling audio from 48 to 44.1hz and adding an audio delay, and the file still compiled faster than through a straiqht TMPGENC encoding!!
Similar Threads
-
Do HD-BURN CD made with Nero work in DVD Players...
By Ensign in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 5Last Post: 11th Sep 2009, 22:43 -
Will the Nero LiquidTV Tivo remote bundle work on Vista MCE?
By yoda313 in forum Media Center PC / MediaCentersReplies: 0Last Post: 21st Nov 2008, 14:53 -
HELP Burn using Nero Express doent work /but NERO VISION work fine
By STAR36 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 4Last Post: 28th Apr 2008, 16:11 -
work-arounds for nero alphabetizing mp3 files
By Mustang.VxD in forum AudioReplies: 6Last Post: 8th Jul 2007, 23:54 -
Nero FLAC plugin doens't work
By happydog500 in forum AudioReplies: 0Last Post: 4th Jun 2007, 13:07