VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Member coody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I want to test the easy and quality of burning a dual layer DVD movie but have to fit it to DVD-5 first. What’s the difference between the DVD Shrink3.2 and Rebuilder? Which one is better and why assuming the original source DVD disc is new without problems?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Shrink is a transcoder, fast, ok quality under 80%
    Rebuilder is a encoder, much slower, better quality
    tgpo famous MAC commercial, You be the judge?
    Originally Posted by jagabo
    I use the FixEverythingThat'sWrongWithThisVideo() filter. Works perfectly every time.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Re-encoding is a lesser of two evils proposition. There's some quality loss when re-encoding MPEGs. However, quality loss when transcoding has nothing to do with lossy codecs. A transcoder actually "throws away" DCT coefficient data, essentially error correction data. Look here for more:

    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?&threadid=63587
    Pull! Bang! Darn!
    Quote Quote  
  4. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by stiltman
    ok quality under 80%
    You cannot say that.
    A reduction of 50% in a Superbit disc can look better than 95% of a poorly encoded disc.
    The % is based off the source quality.

    Rebuilder automates an encoder.
    Shrink is a transcoder.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    Originally Posted by stiltman
    ok quality under 80%
    You cannot say that.
    A reduction of 50% in a Superbit disc can look better than 95% of a poorly encoded disc.
    The % is based off the source quality.

    Rebuilder automates an encoder.
    Shrink is a transcoder.
    I can say that
    My comments were generalized, so give me a freaking break...
    How many damn people talk about superbit DVDs in the first place? I see one post in the last year! in this forum

    Shrink can also skip any transcoding and just create and iso, so your last comment is wrong.

    Care to add anything else that really wont help the OP?
    tgpo famous MAC commercial, You be the judge?
    Originally Posted by jagabo
    I use the FixEverythingThat'sWrongWithThisVideo() filter. Works perfectly every time.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member archaeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    mountains
    Search Comp PM
    OK OK easy does it.

    It is true that Shrink is a self contained transcoder, but DVDRB is not an encoder... It is an interface tool that can utilize several different encoders - CCE, HC, Quenc, etc.. You have to direct it to an encoder. DVDRB provides an easy way to backup DVD discs through encoding, which is, in almost all cases, superior to transcoding. Fritzi is correct in that transcoders throw out information in order to achieve compression, while encoders do not.

    With the speed of todays processors, the time it takes to encode is so greatly reduced compared to when DVDshrink was still being developed, that I almost entirely choose to encode (regardless of compression) rather than transcode.

    DVDRB is a highly versatile tool that allows you many options for encoding, that include using avisynth filters, choosing matrices, cropping, blanking, etc..
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!