VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    "AT&T is upgrading their phone lines to offer video programmes over phone line. The service, called U-verse TV will be available in parts of Southern California communities initially. Channel lineups will be similar to traditional cable and dish offerings. AT&T is insisting that, 'This offering is on par with those of its cable rivals. But AT&T claims that it offers customers more for their money, including fast channel changing, video-on-demand, three set-top boxes, a digital video recorder, a picture-in-picture feature that allows viewers to surf channels without switching channels and an interactive program guide.'"


    https://uverse1.att.com/launchAMSS.do
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  2. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    There is a lot of controversy over this right now, in some areas. Between the various groups (including AT&T themselves), I have no idea what the good and bad points are to this.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    U-Verse is a form of IPTV using the multicast model. Instead of tuning from channels on cable coax, the receiver requests packets for the channel desired. If all on the subnet request the same stream, data loading is low. If all request different streams the subnet may overload.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-Verse
    Quote Quote  
  4. Man of Steel freebird73717's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Smallville, USA
    Search PM
    My phone provider offers this already. Local company not affiliated with att. Picture is on par with sattelite tv. Only times there are any macroblock problems is when I am downloading large files and using a lot of bandwith while surfing the net.
    Donadagohvi (Cherokee for "Until we meet again")
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member buttzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Deep Space Nine
    Search Comp PM
    verizon also has that planned. That why their installing fiber optic in a lot of places here in philadelphia to replace the old phone lines
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I have this service currently and have no typical Satelite TV issues (macroblock etc etc) The service uses VDSL2 to get you TV/Internet/Voip service. Everything comes into a Residential Gateway through a 47MB connection. Out of that bandwith 6mb are used for internet and the rest is dedicated to your TVs. Currently you have only 4 video streams for your use which means that you can be watching 4 different programs on 4 TV's or watching 2 different programs and recording 2 different programs. How you use the different streams is up to you. In the near future they are going to up the streams to 8 to allow a household with 4 TV's to watch them as well as record 4 at the same time or a 2 TV household to watch 2 TV's and record up to 6 programs. The HD channels are not as nice as they could be and your currently limited to watching only one HD stream at a time. This is changing very soon when they upgrade the total bandwith of the service.

    All in all I love that I can get 400+ channels to include 45+ HD channels and 6/1 internet all for 129 a month. I have had my service since april and havent had a since problem with it since it was installed. The channels change fast, the picture quality is nice and I love all the online stuff you get with the service.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    SF, CA, USA
    Search Comp PM
    All I can say is WOW, and it's about time someone came along and challenged the COMCAST monopoly in my locale. $129 is a little more than 1/2 of what I'm paying now for the comparable lineup with COMCAST.
    Matters of great concern should be taken lightly.
    Matters of small concern should be taken seriously.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Rocklin, CA USA
    Search Comp PM
    I work for a telecom provider that currently provides this type service over copper as well as on a fiber network similar to Verizon's (however, it is a tad more advanced). While it sounds good, the limited area in which this can be rolled out on the copper areas - you thought getting DSL from AT&T was hard, this causes you be even closer to the switch unless they rolled fiber to the RT's in your 'hood. And the troubles with inground plant that this product generally illustrates will prevent a good number of subscribers from actually being able to get it. Even less will actually want to keep it after they do sign up for it - we had about 90% cancellation rate within 45 days of customer getting this service.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by slacker
    All I can say is WOW, and it's about time someone came along and challenged the COMCAST monopoly in my locale. $129 is a little more than 1/2 of what I'm paying now for the comparable lineup with COMCAST.
    Why can't you go 'dish' ?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    dish internet has HUGE delay -- a lot of things just time out
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!