For anyone that uses Clone DVD2 and has a critical eye, what is the lowest % when artifacts become visible? IOWs', just where does the degradation become evident?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
Why are ones and zeros so complicated? Linear Video Editing was easier. Downloading & streaming are two different things.
-
I've been using cloneDVD2 for years and have a 50" HDTV and an OPPO upconverting DVD player and will go up to 70% compression with no obvious reduction in quality. You will hear others say that they won't go under 90% but I can't notice a difference. If you go out of your way making comparisons you might notice something but it is minimal and you won't notice it if you are watching a movie. Those that claim to see a difference do tests by blowing up a very small portion of a dark or complicated scene to inspect it. But who really does that when viewing a DVD? I am more than a casual user and have hundreds of backed up movies, 3 burners and several different burning softwares including Rebuilder that I use for long movies that require heavier compression. I use CloneDVD2 for 98% of everything else up to 70%.
I love children, girl children... about 16-40
W.C. Fields -
70% seems awfully low. I did remember seeing a difference with a higher %, but don't remember just what it was when I did a quick compairison (not enlarging anything as you stated).
Why are ones and zeros so complicated? Linear Video Editing was easier. Downloading & streaming are two different things. -
please post dvd backuping in the dvd to dvd forum and not dvd authoring forum. moving you.
-
Sorry, too many choices...............
Why are ones and zeros so complicated? Linear Video Editing was easier. Downloading & streaming are two different things. -
Originally Posted by videobruceI love children, girl children... about 16-40
W.C. Fields -
The is no absolute number. It depends as much on the quality and encoding used in the original file as it does on what is acceptable to you. I use DV Shrink, which uses the same transcoding method as CloneDVD. I have done some discs where coming down to only 90% made for visible artifacts because the original bitrate was already fairly low. Every source is different.
Read my blog here.
-
I have done some discs where coming down to only 90% made for visible artifacts because the original bitrate was already fairly low. Every source is different.
Any way one would know that in advance so as to judge what might be acceptable for the copy instead of trial and error?Why are ones and zeros so complicated? Linear Video Editing was easier. Downloading & streaming are two different things. -
I go by the colors ... red ... yellow ... green ... LOL
But actually .... I use CloneDVD2 to rip the DVD and remove what I don't want.
I then use DVDShrink 3.2 or ... if I have time ... DVD Rebuilder Pro.
If I'm in a super hurry and quality is not that important ... I will use CloneDVD2 to do everything ... if it is in the yellow region.
Yesterday ... I ripped with AnyDVD and CloneDVD2 and then tried to use DVDShrink 3.2 to the compression ... but it didn't want to compress it ... the movie was CRANK.
I did compress it ... I used Cyberlink PowerDVD Copy 1.00.0222 ... instead.
It also does an analysis ... and then does the encode thing and then burns to a DVD.
Similar Threads
-
Video compression error: The source image format is not acceptable
By jh443 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 8Last Post: 25th Apr 2011, 21:56 -
clonedvd2 problem...
By ironmanDD in forum DVD RippingReplies: 0Last Post: 29th Jan 2011, 20:29 -
video compression error: The source image format is not acceptable.
By cutepraba in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 12th Dec 2010, 10:21 -
Slysoft CloneDVD2 VS Shrink No Compression
By mn072065 in forum DVD RippingReplies: 0Last Post: 14th Nov 2010, 13:21 -
CloneDVD2
By pepegot1 in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 2Last Post: 10th May 2008, 17:46