VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Search Comp PM
    Is there a place to download custom profiles for the recording settings used in WinTV2000? I was just hoping to mess around with settings others have used successfully.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member The_Doman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Search PM
    To get you started here are some recording settings for the WINTV2000 program, I use those with my PVR150 cards.

    Just run the attached register file and then start WINTV2000 again.
    The following recording profiles should then be visible:

    6000-8000-256
    5500-8000-256
    5000-8000-256
    5000-7500-256
    5000-7000-256
    4500-6500-256
    4000-6000-256

    For example 5000-7000-256 wil make a recording with a variable bitrate between 5000-7000 and the audio will be 256
    Depending on the on-screen action you should fit almost 2 hours on a DVD with those settings.
    Just experiment a bit with those settings..


    wintv2000recscustom.zip
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Search Comp PM
    Cool. Thank you.

    I'll give these a try.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Have you ever checked to see just how variable the bitrates are on your recordings? I get the impression with HW based encoders they have parameters set, but are really more of a pseudo variable bitrate than truly variable. Eg recordings params 5000-8000 will result in a file where 85-90-95% of the file will be 6500 with a few peaks and troughs.. eg they dont really vary the bitrate by much at all.. I mean they cant foretell the future so the bitrate must balance over a very short period? Which would lead one to think that its best record at 15000kb or Max Kbs and then re-encode later using software to strip out the excessive bitrate.
    Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
    The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member FulciLives's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA in the USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by RabidDog
    Which would lead one to think that its best record at 15000kb or Max Kbs and then re-encode later using software to strip out the excessive bitrate.
    That actually is not an uncommon thing to do for people that own a hardware MPEG encoder capture card/device.

    Another benefit of this is easy editing plus the ability to filter the video and audio when re-encoding with a software encoder.

    Plus with a software encoder you can get a true multi-pass VBR encode.

    However with a decent enough quality source and a decent enough bitrate you don't HAVE to do it that way ... sometimes once is enough.

    - John "FulciLives" Coleman
    "The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
    EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member The_Doman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by RabidDog
    I mean they cant foretell the future so the bitrate must balance over a very short period? Which would lead one to think that its best record at 15000kb or Max Kbs and then re-encode later using software to strip out the excessive bitrate.
    Ofcourse it's not perfect....
    For really optimal results I prefer to capture in MJPEG/DV and do a 2-pass VBR encode.
    This will give me superior results compared to the single pass hardware encoding.
    The big problem ofcourse is all the re-encoding takes so much time it is not funny anymore.
    Specially if you are capturing hours and hours a day it is very nice to be able to author your recordings directly to DVD.
    And the results can still be very good..
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by RabidDog
    Which would lead one to think that its best record at 15000kb or Max Kbs and then re-encode later using software to strip out the excessive bitrate.
    I used to capture at that rate with my PVR 150, but I just started using Dscaler to capture in AVI/HuffyUV. It is time consuming to then to convert to mpeg2 but the results are vastly superior.
    No more straight mpeg2 captures for me.
    NEC 3500AG - Firmware 2.TG
    LiteOn 16P9S - Firmware FS09
    Taiyo Yuden 8X, FujiFilm 8X YUDEN000T02, Phillips 8X CMC MAG-E01-000.
    DVDDecrypter, DVDShrink, DVDFab, Nero 7
    ------
    Hauppage WinTV PVR 150
    Dscaler, TMPGEnc Plus/Author, Canopus ProCoder, CCE.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Surely with new dual cores (have you heard ?) you can split your re-encodes in half and let one proc do each half.. plus cpus are getting faster and faster and more capable (64 bit ext, sse3) so mpeg re-encoding should be less and less of a chore.
    Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
    The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    As long as the program is capable of utilitizing the dual processing. Not all can. Check the descriptions to make sure your program can take advantage of the extra power.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    A few people have mentioned in the forums that the hauppauge PVR-x50 cards typical "overshoot" the maximum bit rate when using VBR. I was looking at lordsmurf's site, and his discussion of optimal bitrates to use. He explains that for 720x480, 5500 - 8000 using VBR is optimal. If the Hauppauge cards overshoot the max rate, would a Hauppauge card at 5500 - 7000 then be equivalent to the ideal of 5500 - 8000 for VBR? I can get 2 hours (barely!) using 5500-7000 at 720x480 on a single layer DVD.

    And, would the source matter, that is, already MPEG-2 compressed and therefore reduced quality/detail video from my Dish receiver benefit from that ideal bitrate, or would a slightly lower VBR yield the same results?


    Sorry if the is a dumb question, maybe I misread lordsmurf's guide.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!