I capture from digital camera through a simple firewire interface directly and then edit in Pinnacle Studio 10 and at last make DVD after putting titles, transitions... .But render takes too much time (approx 3 times of video length) and is boring and unreliable (Power interrupts, Hanging...):
1) Which one gives the best quality: capturing and converting AVI to MPEG-2 through a mid-price capture card and then editing MPEG-2 file (so render time will decrease, because Pinnacle have not to convert AVI to MPEG-2 and capture card do this), or my current way, capture and edit AVI and then render to MPEG-2?
2) If I capture AVI and at last render to MPEG-2, does capture card decrease render time or imporove output quality? Or its function is only real-time conversion from AVI to MPEG-2 by thier own hardware and it hasn't any effect on video output quality and render speed?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Similar Threads
-
Please Help with converting AC3 in an AVI to an AVI with MPEG-1/MPEG-2
By twin1701 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 13th Jul 2010, 14:11 -
new Virtualdub MPEG - still a colorspace problem with MPEG-&
By sanlyn in forum EditingReplies: 6Last Post: 10th Aug 2009, 22:18 -
How to convert an MPEG file to DV-AVI Type 2 using MPEG Streamclip
By MAdNEZ in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 15Last Post: 4th Aug 2009, 07:30 -
Strange problem between AVI(mpeg) file and DVD based on AVI(mpeg) file
By 1234567 in forum DVD RippingReplies: 49Last Post: 15th Feb 2009, 07:36 -
DGIndexed MPEG or AVI wrapped MPEG best for AVISynth?
By flywitness in forum EditingReplies: 1Last Post: 12th Sep 2008, 09:08