VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 15th Jan 2006 19:55 #1
    jwedge
    jwedge is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Troy, MI
    Search Comp PM
    Worthwhile the upgrade $ ??? Is the Nero Recode the same in both versions?
    Thanks for any reply.
    Regards
    Quote Quote  
  2. 15th Jan 2006 20:13 #2
    redwudz
    redwudz is offline
    Mod Neophyte redwudz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    Personally, I would have stuck with Nero 5.5 if I didn't need 6.x for my newer burners. No way I want 7.0. Nero just adds more unnecessary stuff to their later versions. Just my opinion. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    I only use Nero for burning. The rest of what they include in their bloatware package can be done much better by individual programs.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 15th Jan 2006 22:32 #3
    whitejremiah
    whitejremiah is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    i agree, strongly.....you dont need nero for audio compression, video compression (although thats probably the best chunk of their bloatware) making your coffee in the morning, ect........all can be done much better elsewhere...that and the fact that absolutely NOTHING on the market yet actually makes use of whatever new features they added in reguard to blu ray/hd dvd........
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!