VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. I am considering to upgrade my burner to a Dual Layer model since I need to be able to record 2 hours of video with the best video quality.
    My experience so far indicates that you can only get 1 hour of good video quality in a 4.7 GB disc.
    Are dual layer disck "generally" compatible with older DVD players (set top boxes)?
    What is the average price for a dual layer disc these days?

    Rene
    Quote Quote  
  2. 4.7GB is more than enough for a 2 hour recording. If you use a good quality encoder at, say 2 pass VBR, then I challenge anyone to tell the difference between a recording encoded at twice the bitrate...
    Quote Quote  
  3. Are you recording from TV I would just get a Panasonic DVD recorder. And DVD-R is fine for two hours. If you get the one with a hard drive you can edit right on the deck.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    not to mention dual layer discs will cost 10 times the price of a single layer dvdr.
    Quote Quote  
  5. and that's if you don't burn any coasters!
    Quote Quote  
  6. I'm waiting for the prices to come way way down before I go spending money for a dual layer burner.
    Quote Quote  
  7. mh2360:

    I have tried and tried and tried getting even 1.5 hour with an acceptable video quality.....using different methods and encoders........and I can tell you.....I see the difference.

    So, can you point me to where I can find the formula you use to get the same level of quality doing compression and getting 2 hours of video in a 4.7 GB DVD disc?

    Rene
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member lumis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the remnants of pangea
    Search Comp PM
    there is no way i'd backup a movie or a tv series to a dvd+rl DL at the current prices. $10/disc just isnt worth it.

    if i were recording a wedding or other personal event, i would definetly consider a dvd+r DL. $10/disc is worth it if its something you plan on keeping for a long long time.

    i've recorded football games (from HD) and i've crammed 2 hours of video on a disc, the results are okay, but not great.. but if i split it up over 2 discs and max out the quality, the results are excellent.

    i guess it just depends on what you're going to put on the dvd+r DL.

    as for compatibility, i'd say its pretty good, as long as you set the book type to dvd-rom. the dvd+r DL's that i've burned have played in every device i've tried.. but i've heard of people having problems at the layer switch.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by mh2360
    4.7GB is more than enough for a 2 hour recording. If you use a good quality encoder at, say 2 pass VBR, then I challenge anyone to tell the difference between a recording encoded at twice the bitrate...
    Originally Posted by rbermude
    mh2360:

    I have tried and tried and tried getting even 1.5 hour with an acceptable video quality.....using different methods and encoders........and I can tell you.....I see the difference.
    What kind of audio is in your project? Is it using PCM (uncompressed)?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Ward River:

    Is the audio important to get longer video in a 4.7 GB disk?

    What setting should I use?

    Rene
    Quote Quote  
  11. Just like with the video, compressing your audio to something like AC3 or MP2 will take up less disc space.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    If stereo, then AC3 at 192 or perhaps 224khz
    If 5.1 then AC3 at 384khz

    MP2 (mpeg1-layer2) can be used in PAL land without a worry, but might not play in NTSC land, where it is an optional audio format.

    PCM, on the otherhand, will eat a quarter of a DVD5 for an hour of audio.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!