I am thinking, Because there are 2 layers on a dual-layer disc, will we :
A) Be able to burn 8.5GB without any further alteration
or
B) Have to do something which will create a layer break to burn a 8.5GB file by seperating it into 2 equal files and then burn. ( Because there has to be a transition between the layers)
Can anybody please give their views as I think DL discs will cause more problems.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
There is software already in development to take advantage of the dual layer burners coming out. The software will determine where the layer break needs to be and get everything in place.
We might find initially some bugs, but I think no more than when standard(DVD-5) DVD authoring software first came out. -
I don't see how it would be a problem...I think the problem is going to be the actual burn of the disk. If they have the mechanics of the data transfer down, then what's the problem?
Data-wise, it should be no different than any other RSDL movie out there. -
I can think of a possible problem with a layer break issue. All of my backups currently have a pause where the layer break was on the original.
It seems possible to me that dual layer burning programs are going to have to create a new layer break, so that each layer has the same amount of data.... meaning, there is a possibility of 2 layer breaks in one movie (the original break, and the new actual layer break).
Similar Threads
-
Could not perform end of disc-at-once on dual layer dvd only
By Subhash in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 20Last Post: 25th May 2009, 13:09 -
dual layer disc
By sicperv in forum DVD RippingReplies: 2Last Post: 25th Feb 2009, 11:11 -
data on dual layer dvd disc......
By dvstorm in forum MediaReplies: 4Last Post: 23rd Feb 2009, 19:21 -
Dual layer disc error (2nd layer not burning properly - AVCHD)
By hhhgamewmx7 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 7Last Post: 24th Aug 2008, 09:00 -
Disc copy of a dual layer disc
By kingjames in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 1st Oct 2007, 13:52