VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33
  1. Member ejai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    New York USA
    Search Comp PM
    Does anyone know what the fastest SVCD software encoder is?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member adam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Recently in another thread someone claimed the latest version of Ulead Mediastudio Pro is faster than cce (cinema craft encoder.) I havent tried the latest version yet because all previous versions were terrible in my opinion but if so I suppose that would be the fastest. Other than that cce is definitely the fastest encoder by far and actually produces arguably the highest quality video possible.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver/Portland
    Search Comp PM
    Just curious, I never tried any other MPEG-2 Encoder other than TMPGEnc, how much faster is Cinema Craft Encoder? An estimate of time difference? And it outputs an even better quality result? So it's faster AND better? Hm.. sounds interesting... =)
    Quote Quote  
  4. It does appear that Ulead is a little faster than CCE. But CCE produces a better quaility MPEG. There's always a trade off
    Quote Quote  
  5. Great program
    I just started using it today
    And i personally love it
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member adam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Jeomite cce is significantly faster than TMPGenc. I can do 4 pass vbr in cce in about the same time it takes me to do 2 pass vbr in TMPGenc with the highest quality settings. Depending on the hardware cce can literally be twice as fast as TMPGenc.

    As far as cce quality versus TMPGenc its very very close. Each program has its benefits over the other and your results depend largely on your source. In my opinion TMPGenc preserves the source's color better and overall appears crisper and more vibrant. CCE on the other hand allows you to achieve an overall higher bitrate since it supports as many passes as you want, although any more than 4 passes is pretty pointless. Also CCE gives you tons more options as far as how your bitrate gets allocated. I think if you really took the time to tweak the bitrate allocation to your specific video then the quality would beat TMPGenc easily, but that takes ALOT of time to configure and its pretty complicated stuff too.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member ejai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    New York USA
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks for the help, by the way Uleads MediaStudio LSX mpeg encoder sucks! Its quality is terrible in comparison to Tmpgenc. I'm gonna check out CCE.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver/Portland
    Search Comp PM
    I just tried CCE v2.62 SP. And I must say, I am INCREDIBLY impressed with it. On a primary test, it provides great results. I'm didn't do a thorough examination on the quality, but for sure, it's atleast as good as TMPGEnc's quality. And then the encoding time, whew... It took about HALF the time as if I used TMPGEnc. I must say it's an great program, but hard to believe it will be worth that $4,000 price tag!

    =)
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    $100 would be about right for CCE. Maybe $110 if it had some more options.

    It is very very good, but NO software in the world is worth $4,000.
    Quote Quote  
  10. On my AMD Thunderbird 1.2ghz system, I find that TMPGEnc 12a is faster with it's CQ_VBR encoding than CCE SP's 3-pass VBR.

    CCE is terrific at controlling bitrate, so you can get an SVCD onto 2 discs, but it takes so much longer and I've had no end of troubles getting audio and video sync'ed up. Also, I have to disable audio encoding on CCE, else it'll crash (it's version 2.50). Anyway, I've heard that CCE's audio quality isn't very good.

    With TMPGEnc, I don't have any of those problems.

    Ulead's MediaStudio uses an older version of the LSX encoder. It's quality is poor compared to CCE and TMPGEnc. You might try dropping in the latest lsx dll's into the Ulead folder and see if they are better? I know the standalone LSX encoder (latest version) is much improved over previous ones).



    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: themamboman on 2001-09-21 06:15:24 ]</font>
    Quote Quote  
  11. Quick question... What is CQ_VBR? Everything I have seen says to use 2Pass_VBR, Is the quality as good using CQ_VBR? Thanks for the info.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver/Portland
    Search Comp PM
    CQ_VBR (Constant Quality Variable BitRate) is equivlant to 1-Pass VBR. So 2-Pass VBR would be better than CQ_VBR (aka 1-Pass VBR). =)

    themamboman,
    You should do a test: TMPGEnc's CQ_VBR vs CCE CQ_VBR (1-Pass VBR), and check those results, instead of comparing TMPGEnc's CQ_VBR vs CCE's 3-Pass VBR. =)


    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Jeomite on 2001-09-23 18:30:57 ]</font>
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Harpreet
    Search PM
    Does anyone have a copy of CCE that supports Pentium II

    If you do, could you please send it to me at HSingh@Softhome.net

    Thanks.
    Quote Quote  
  14. i hope you know that CCE has a minimum requirement of a PIII.
    Quote Quote  
  15. LSX-Mpeg encoder 3.5 does it quick and nice, using the best possible quality still does it faster than TCMPENC.

    I've got it figured out and it does very good quality.

    Alfonso
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver/Portland
    Search Comp PM
    VCDHelp.com just recently put up a comparsion between MPEG-2 Encoders (include the new Nero MPEG-2 Plugin). Seems like LSX doesn't output too much of a high-quality result.

    TMPGEnc seems to be the best choice for anyone who doesn't have $4000 to spend on CCE. =P

    <TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
    LSX-Mpeg encoder 3.5 does it quick and nice, using the best possible quality still does it faster than TCMPENC.
    </BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR></TABLE>

    (What's TCMPENC? lol)
    Quote Quote  
  17. Question, which version of CCE is everyone using? Pro, SB or light.
    Regards
    Quote Quote  
  18. Use Pro v2.50, it accepts .avs files as v2.62 does not.
    Quote Quote  
  19. One thing I noticed about 2.50 is that it allows multiple passes when creating MPEG-1 files, but from what I could tell 2.62 only allows for multiple passes on MPEG-2 files.

    Please tell me if I have overlooked something because I can get version 2.62 "registered" but I can't seem to get 2.50 "registereed" .
    Quote Quote  
  20. Never mind. I just found what I was looking for.
    Quote Quote  
  21. I have LsX v3.5 too. What's the setting for the best quality and still have the fastest encoding?

    <TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
    On 2001-09-24 12:42:40, pocholin wrote:
    LSX-Mpeg encoder 3.5 does it quick and nice, using the best possible quality still does it faster than TCMPENC.

    I've got it figured out and it does very good quality.

    Alfonso
    </BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR></TABLE>
    Quote Quote  
  22. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Harpreet
    Search PM
    While asking for a CCE version that supports Pii, I thought there might have been an earlier version that did that. The current versions (on the website) all require Piii minimum.
    Quote Quote  
  23. I can't get CCE to take my DV avi capture (from Sony DVMC). Is there any way of getting this to work?
    -Thanks
    Quote Quote  
  24. <TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
    On 2001-09-25 13:41:35, Harpreet wrote:
    While asking for a CCE version that supports Pii, I thought there might have been an earlier version that did that. The current versions (on the website) all require Piii minimum.
    </BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR></TABLE>

    There is no version of CCE that supports P2's. You need a Athlon, Celeron2, P3 or P4 to use any version.
    Quote Quote  
  25. CCE is also working on my Duron processor
    Quote Quote  
  26. dang.. where are you folks getting the money to buy this 4000 dollah encoder.. someone tell me the secret.. my goodness
    Quote Quote  
  27. teamhawaii,
    if i have 4000 bucks, i would not spend it buying a software encoder. i'd rather buy the fastest PC i can
    find for that much money and use TMPGEnc.
    Quote Quote  
  28. <TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
    On 2001-09-27 02:51:59, teamhawaii wrote:
    dang.. where are you folks getting the money to buy this 4000 dollah encoder.. someone tell me the secret.. my goodness
    </BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR></TABLE>

    How to tell a secret when you don't have your e-mail address displayed?
    Quote Quote  
  29. i emailed you my email.. mebe you got a tip to help me.
    Quote Quote  
  30. <TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font size=-1>Quote:</font><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT SIZE=-1><BLOCKQUOTE>
    On 2001-09-30 02:33:27, teamhawaii wrote:
    i emailed you my email.. mebe you got a tip to help me.
    </BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR size=1 color=black></TD></TR></TABLE>

    I tried several times to mail you back, but every time the mail is coming back with an error.

    Check your PM.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!