Which one is better for capturing (be honest now)
Mac:
G4 450Mhz
512 MB SDRAM
40 GB HD
PC:
AMD Athlon XP 1800+
512 MB DDRAM
30GB+10GB
I have heard that MACs are overall better for video capture/editing. If this is the case, since I have an extra G4, I can use that instead and then move it to the PC for DVD-burning over LAN or CD-R.
Thank you
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
What you need to look at is the speed at which the system can write data to the hard drive - its min, max, and average.
the formula is as follows:
Horizontal_pixels * vertical_pixels * ( color_depth/8 ) * Frames_per_second
This will give the raw video MB/sec needed for video capture - using huffyuv or even lossy codec will bring down the MB/sec, but increase the CPU usage. VirtualDub has a benchmark that will simulate the above formula captured to a drive. I can't remember a MAC OS one at the moment.
What is your final objective(format) and how much free hard drive space do you have? Judging form the list of specs - I would probably go with the PC since the MAC is on the slow/old side and there are more filters/programs for creating VCD/SVCD/CVD/DVDs for the PC. Don't get me wrong - MACs are great for professional video editing - currently using a dual 1.4ghz, 2gig ram, 1tera byte HD space, and final cut pro 4 for movie production.
Similar Threads
-
Minimum System Requirements for capturing miniDV
By darkwhite in forum ComputerReplies: 19Last Post: 27th May 2012, 07:21 -
New system
By didikai in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 14Last Post: 21st Jun 2011, 07:36 -
Can someone recommend good low-mid-price system for video-editing/capturing
By johnharlin in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 17th Jun 2011, 07:08 -
Capturing PAL-M VHS (Brazil) on UK system. Help!
By Killer3737 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 13Last Post: 11th Nov 2008, 10:24 -
System
By Seasonal in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 26th Jun 2007, 09:54