VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Thinkin' about getting an HDTV? Before you buy, read these articles for a better understanding of what NOT to buy.

    HDTV Quest: The Never-ending Story
    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1052887,00.asp

    LCD vs. DLP Shootout: LCD Panels Fade
    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1049289,00.asp

    one of the best sites for finding service menu tweaks
    http://www.keohi.com/keohihdtv/

    HDTV discussion forums
    http://www.avsforum.com/
    http://www.hometheaterspot.com/
    Quote Quote  
  2. I can say this about flat screen that they can burn in like old TV's if you watch tv station that have there LOGO's on the corner they can burn in. So I would never buy flat screen unless you only buy it to watch DVD's but I watch more TV then DVD's
    Quote Quote  
  3. I've had my 43" HDTV WS for about 6 months. I don't regret buying it. I watch mostly DVD's and on an HDTV, dvd's look killer... coupled with 5.1 surround sound... you can't beat it.

    Regular TV is another matter. I have DirecTV. The picture is about eaqual to VHS quality. That's to be expected when they compress 900+ chanels through a litttle coaxle cable.

    The market is shifting towards HDTV. Why? Has to do with the goverment wanting to sell off the old standard. When...hmm 5 or 6 years. NOT buy? If you watch a lot of TV, it's not realy for you. If you watch a lot of DVD movies then, yes.

    All info gathered from

    http://www.network54.com/Forum/213962
    Don't give in to DVD2ONE, that leads to the dark side.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    @ marco33,

    I'm not sure I fully understand how those 900+ channels cause the poor
    quality in DirecTV's output, but I do believe it to some extent though, cause
    I'm not blind. The quality IS quite pixelated on all the channels (though
    still good quality) .. ..

    But, you also have to factor in some other OUTSIDE/EXTERNAL issues at
    play here:
    * who "tainted" the source ie, STrek Enterprise is tainted
    * poorly done conversions/transfers
    * 2nd hand and 3rd hand pre-processes and hand-overs (from one station
    ...to the next)
    * and a few more in the back on my mind.

    It's all a conspericy to me. Cause, like i said in a past thread elsewhere's..
    3+ years ago, when I first got Satellite (and they had fewer channels) the
    quality was outstanding. ie, blacks were blacks, and not chizeled or smokey
    looking and/or sun or solar flare looking, as in many of those Strek Voyager
    solid scenes.
    When you looked at a video, it was like (or very close to) DVD quality.
    But, today, it's another story. However, some videos do come out nicer
    than others. I did a short capture of TCM and AMC (new channels I got
    w/ an upgrade package) and the quality of these movies were very good,
    though not at good as they could have been (and probably had ben) back
    3 years ago. AMC aired, "The good, bad and the Ugly" and I was VERY
    happy w/ the quality !! Also, on TCM, they aired a letterboxed version of
    "Guys and Dolls" and that too, was in very good quality. So, my guess is
    that you have to learn all the channels that produce a given airing's shows
    quality, and that could vary. Who has time for all this nonase ?? Well, I
    guess it all boils down to how far you will go in your video-to-CD/DVD
    endeavors

    -vhelp
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!