Hello, I'm trying to capture a VHS with the best quality possible. My VHS only have SCART output. Someone at doom9 forums told me about the passthrough "technique", which consist on connecting the VHS to a DVR, then the DVR (in passthrough mode) to a capture device, to reduce the VHS wobbly effect (I believe it is called TBC).
I only have a Pioneer 545-HX, but I don't see any passthrough options on the menu. Is this possible with this model?
Will I get the same quality with these connection combinations, or will one of them be better than the other? What would you guys recommend?
SCART out -> SCART to composite adapter -> Composite in
SCART out -> SCART in
SCART out with SCART to composite cable -> Composite in
Thanks in advance!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 24 of 24
-
-
Depends on the quality of the cables/adapters, no one can give you an answer, you will have to experiment yourself.
-
There is no special "pass-through" setting, you just routing/passing the video through the recorder.
All connectors are using composite, so normally they should give the same result.
But what you should try is to use the S-Video output of the recorder and use that for your capture device, that could possible give you better results.
Also if your Pioneer recorder will improve/stabilize the image, you just have to try it?
Last edited by The_Doman; 19th Oct 2024 at 15:01.
-
I thought it was an special setting, since I've read some things like "most DVRs are capable of doing VHS passthrough..." and such. But, since this VHS capturing technique consist on just connecting a VHS to a DVR, then capturing the DVR output... wouldn't literally all DVR be capable of this so called passthrough? Or maybe I got it wrong, and the passthrough can be done with any DVR, and the TBC stabilization is the thing most DVRs are capable, but not all, am I right?
Thanks, I guess it would all depend on the cables quality after all, the combination shouldn't affect the final result.
Yes, of course, I'm usins S-Video to connect my DVR to my capture device.
And yes, on a first quick test, the image seems more stable, I will do more extensive tests tomorrow. The funny thing is that, my cheap capture device only outputs B/W signal when used with S-Video in a Linux OS (driver issues, I guess), but not on Windows. I does output color on Linux when using composite, but the Windows driver seems to give lower quality. So I will try this to compare:
VHS directly to capture device with composite, Linux
VHS directly to capture device with composite, Windows
VHS to DVR to capture device with composite, Linux
VHS to DVR to capture device with composite, Windows
VHS to DVR to capture device with S-video, Windows
Sorry for all the details, part of them are for myself, to not get lost with all the different tests xD -
No there isn't any special setting, all dvrs (at least that I'm aware of) will digitize the video signal and then output a stable signal on the output. (Compared to say a vcr which will just pass the video signal straight through directly without going via any processing other than maybe going via the automatic gain control circuit that might screw with the video levels if the tape has copy protection).
The "capability" is more about the capabilities of the video decoder ICs in the DVR, where a few contain extra functionality for horizontal stabilization. Panasonic dvd-recorders are most well known for it but pioneers from 2005 and newer (DVR-_30 and newer, the _30 models might differ slighly from the later ones) also work relatively well though not quite as well as the panasonics (though they are a bit more configurable and don't have the issues with bright clipping of the panasonics.) So this model should work well.
The dvd-recorders that don't work well will also digitize the input and output a stable video signal but have video decoders that lack the capabilities to stabilize the input particularly well so you end up with vidoe that's wiggly and/or with video that drops out on issues that might not be any better than the capture device directly (though even some of the pretty mediocre ones might work better than a lot of the capture devices since most capture devices handle direct vcr input really badly.) -
IC = Integrated Circuit, aka "Chip". A hardware component.
Video Decoder IC: A chip which does the decoding of the video signal. -
I've been capturing with different combinations and two different capture devices, this is what I tried (connection from VHS to DVR is always done with a SCART/Composite cable and adapter):
August - VHS to DVR with Composite to Linux
August - VHS to DVR with Composite to Windows
August - VHS to DVR with SVideo to Windows
August - VHS with Composite to Linux
August - VHS with Composite to Windows
Hauppauge - VHS to DVR with Composite to Linux
Hauppauge - VHS to DVR with Composite to Windows
Hauppauge - VHS to DVR with SVideo to Linux
Hauppauge - VHS to DVR with SVideo to Windows
Hauppauge - VHS with Composite to Linux
Hauppauge - VHS with Composite to Windows
And here are the results:
Another frame:
Here are my conclusions:
The VHS direct connections were just tests. However, the Hauppauge capture has less wobble effect, I guess it has a built-in corrector for this.
I would prefer August -> VHS > DVR (Composite) > Windows over August > VHS (Composite) > Windows, since the image is way more stable. But, I would say the first one has a bit more of detail.
Between August > VHS > DVR (Composite) > Windows and August > VHS > DVR (SVideo) > Windows, I would say the first one has a bit more of detail, but has color bleed compared to the second one.
Comparing August> VHS > DVR (SVideo) > Windows and Hauppauge > VHS > DVR (SVideo) Linux I see almost no differences, but maybe the later has a bit more detail?
I would appreciate your opinions, it would help me decide which option to choose. Here are the samples uploaded:
https://mega.nz/file/wZZjgaRA#N9ez71ClDjUy6NT4ptw6fG0t6qY-xl6EIM0vGEFjexg
My DVR also has a HDMI output port, would a cheap HDMI capture give me a significant difference, given the analog source and connection from a VHS player and tape? I guess the analog-to-digital conversion would be done on the DVR instead on my cheap USB capture devices, right? Would that improve quality?Last edited by eXtremeDevil; 20th Oct 2024 at 12:48.
-
No ambition here to inspect and analyze all your thumbnails etc. (and they seem to be ok at a first glance) so just the bottom line again:
As you currently have a VCR with SCART/Composite and no TBC, and as you are using USB dongles for capturing, the recommended configuration is:
VCR SCART Composite OUT -> DVD Recorder SCART (or RCA) Composite IN -> DVD Recorder S-Video OUT -> Capture device S-Video IN
If your DVD Recorder has a setting like "2D/3D Comb Filter" or "Y/C filter" or similar (depending on the model) it should be enabled (ON), because is separates the luma from the chroma, means converts Composite to S-video sloppy speaking. Hence the DVD recorder performs 2 functions:
- It stabilizes the horizontal line jitter ("line TBC")
- It makes a decent luma/chroma separation preventing DotCrawl and Rainbow artefacts which are typical for Composite with inferior Y/C filters in the capture device (like your USB dongles).
This is independent of Windows or Linux.
I don't know your Pioneer DVD recorder, but you may take a look here as guideline and hints for settings:
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/403635-Panasonic-DVD-recorder-passthrough-settings...5)#post2636157
In a next step you may want to learn Avisynth basics to analyze your captures using histograms and waveform monitors. Plenty of posts and tutorials in this forum.Last edited by Sharc; 21st Oct 2024 at 14:33.
-
As complemet to what Sharc properly said, if you want to explore the alternative flow you should capture the HDMI out of the DVD-Recorder with a quality device (not a cheap one degrading the quality). A guideline here: https://gleitz-info.translate.goog/forum/index.php?thread/47572-tutorial-hochwertiges-..._x_tr_pto=wapp
No. We recently had a comparison here: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/416184-Which-VCR-for-PAL-VHS-capture-(Composite-an...e2#post2754408 -
I not have analyzed all the capture that closely, they they all look pretty fuzzy to me.
Possible you can change some playback settings (sharpness) on the VHS player?
Or it could be just this recording.
But if you are testing/comparing, you can also try recording with the Pioneer itself?
It can write/transfer to all media (DVD-RAM/+-RW)
Could be interesting to compare.
Also that recorder has some really useful feature: recording of PAL-60.
-
-
-
-
-
The opposite. The picture quality of the player is the most important element (together with the condition of the tapes). What we are talking about here is the “quality improvement features” of the VCRs, that are nowadays obsolete. Use edit mode and turn off all features for a better capture.
-
I don't expect you guys to go through all the tests, but at least I would like you take into account my conclusions and comment them:
I would prefer August -> VHS > DVR (Composite) > Windows over August > VHS (Composite) > Windows, since the image is way more stable. But, I would say the first one has a bit more of detail.
Between August > VHS > DVR (Composite) > Windows and August > VHS > DVR (SVideo) > Windows, I would say the first one has a bit more of detail, but has color bleed compared to the second one.
Comparing August> VHS > DVR (SVideo) > Windows and Hauppauge > VHS > DVR (SVideo) Linux I see almost no differences, but maybe the later has a bit more detail?
I don't see any extra options on the VHS or the VCR, so I guess it is what it is.
I have some Avisynth knowledge, so yes, the next step will be restoration.
So? What is it then? Only an expensive HDMI capture device would make any difference, you mean? -
Not completely. Did you read the guide and the linked comparison?
The DVR does the A/D conversion with its own quality, which is not better than the standard workflow when using one of the recommended capture card.
You then need a proper HDMI capture device to preserve the digital 4:2:2 uncompressed interlaced video streamed out of the HDMI connection (such the one suggested in the guide), because many cheap HDMI capture toys alter the architecture of the fields, deinterlace on the fly, compress to mjpeg or h264 and all this sort of defects. -
You're welcome
-
No, because cheap devices usually convert to MJPG, drop frames, etc. I know because I have one
You can buy a stationary recorder that records to H.264/H.265 on a memory card.
I guess the analog-to-digital conversion would be done on the DVR instead on my cheap USB capture devices, right? Would that improve quality?Last edited by rgr; 22nd Oct 2024 at 12:07.
Similar Threads
-
Pioneer GGV 1305 Service Disc, Compatible with Pioneer DVR-560H?
By Big Al in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 29Last Post: 1st Apr 2025, 06:51 -
Capturing via DV passthrough or with S-video capture card?
By Kocane in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 87Last Post: 30th Sep 2024, 07:02 -
S-VHS JVC VCR as comb filter passthrough for non S-VHS VCR?
By Krazern in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 22Last Post: 6th May 2024, 06:18 -
JVC HR-S7600AM S-VHS VS. HM-DH5U D-VHS Capturing a VHS Tape
By dellsam34 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 26Last Post: 25th Aug 2023, 10:18 -
Pioneer DVR-520 and DVR-560 functionality discussion
By jcool in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 142Last Post: 17th Aug 2021, 19:45