Why did dvd+r start out at 2.4x?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
CAuse 2x -R was out and it made it seem better to push it the extra mile.
-
To paraphrase a line from "This Is Spinal Tap": "It's 0.4 higher now, isn't it?"
-
It's not up for public discussion. That's the way the DVD Alliance wants it. Keep meddling in their grand scheme to control the world and you'll be burning CD-Rs on a 1X burner out of Hong Kong!
-
Because they refused to listen to me!
I wanted 1.659X for compatibility with CD players but they just laughed at me!
And you should of heard the nasty things they actualy said when I also suggested putting grooves on the label side for Phonograph compatability!!
Same type fools as those dummies that refused my suggestion to make tape backup tapes compatible with 8track players, and you see how quick those 240mb tapes went down the tubes NOW!!!
HA HA I got the laugh on them
-
But they DID listen to you to burn DVD+R at 8x and DVD+RW at 4x.Originally Posted by overloaded_ide
Unfortunately you forgot to tell DVD Forum the same...
You stop me again whilst I'm walking and I'll cut your fv<king Jacob's off. -
But Alliance forget to make 8x +R media too. Don't quote the crap around the corner either. If the drive is here, the media should be too.Originally Posted by tompikaWant my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
Like they need 8x media to write at 8x...Originally Posted by lordsmurf
4xTY,MCC,RICOH are good enough to do so...
I was trying to be funny, referring to overloaded_ide's blue joke....Originally Posted by lordsmurf
Don't take it seriously, go have some rest or a cup of coffee...You stop me again whilst I'm walking and I'll cut your fv<king Jacob's off.



Quote
