What's the best resolution to use when encoding an AVI to MPEG2 for a DVD when the source is VHS captured through an analog to digital converter? I've seen lots of people suggest 352x480(576) and say that's the best you can expect for quality from VHS but does that apply when you're capturing in DV format or is it just for analog captures. For DV you don't have the choice of capturing at anything but 720x480(576) do you?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-
352x480(576 for PAL) is the nearest to VHS resolution and is therefore the best format to use for DVD's when capturing from VHS. Because its half the DVD resolution you can use lower bitrate. I usually put 2 films on 1 DVD when using this resolution, depending on the length of the films.
DV is indeed fixed at 720x480(576 for PAL), its designed for DV camcorders and the like.The Unofficial VMagic Support Site
http://vmagic.unimatrixhub.net -
but when using an analog to digital converter the resulting file is going to be a DV AVI even when the source is VHS so is 352x480(576) still the best resolution to use when encoding the file to MPEG2?
-
Using an analog the digital converter to capture your video will not improve the quality or increase the resolution so yes, 352x480(576) is the best resolution when transcoding your DV (from VHS) capture to MPEG2.
If you were capturing from a DV camcorder then 720x480(576) would be the best resolution for the MPEG2.
If you are still in doubt, try capturing a short clip and transcode it twice, once to 352x480(576), and once to 720x480(576). Then compare the two resulting files.The Unofficial VMagic Support Site
http://vmagic.unimatrixhub.net -
I realize it won't give better quality than an analog capture at the lower resolution. What I'm saying is the analog signal (which technically doesn't really have a resolution) is already being converted to DV at 720x480 so wouldn't encoding that AVI file to a lower resolution MPEG hurt the quality in this case?
-
I see your point. I don't think that transcoding to a lower resoultion will hurt the quality. I frequently record films to 720x576 MPEG and then transcode them to 352x576 so I can get 2 films one DVD+R.
As I said earlier, capture a short clip to DV and transcode the clip twice, once to each of the above mentioned resolutions, and compare the two. You may see a differnce where others may not.The Unofficial VMagic Support Site
http://vmagic.unimatrixhub.net
Similar Threads
-
Can I use a U.S Canopus ADVC-100 in the U.K?
By jedi55 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 33Last Post: 6th Oct 2012, 18:26 -
Canopus ADVC-100 vs Canopus ADVC-110
By tarrickb in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 20Last Post: 16th Oct 2010, 20:52 -
ADVC 100 and ADVC 300 non recognized in Windows
By scardi in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 28th Feb 2010, 01:23 -
ADVC-300 vs. ADVC-100
By DeadLily in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 11Last Post: 19th Sep 2007, 08:15 -
Canopus ADVC-100 outputs
By datman in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 2Last Post: 7th May 2007, 18:24