Hi Guys,
So what's the main hardware I'd need to rip DVDs specifically to HDD at the fastest possible pace. Does the speed of the DVD player (16× , 24x) limit it or is it the CPU or the source disc itself that's most important. What should I be looking for?
Thanks.
		
			+ Reply to Thread
			
		
		
		
			
	
	
				Results 1 to 10 of 10
			
		- 
	
- 
	Easy enough to check. Look at your CPU, RAM, HDD usage during a rip (A direct copy of a video file, not a conversion.) 
 With a MS OS, look at Task Manager for that info.
 
 I would guess the optical drive speed to be the most important factor.
 
 For a conversion to a different video format, then CPU speed and number of threads.
 
 Other members may have different opinions.
 
 And welcome to our forums.  
- 
	I would concur. 
 
 But I would also add that 'fastest possible pace' is not a good idea since it could create read-errors. Same that few would recommend that you burn a disk at maximum speed. For a 16x drive 8x really should suffice. And even that might be too fast.
- 
	Thanks guys... 
 Here's a task manager screen shot. https://postimg.org/image/213oxsx3ln/
 
 Burner http://www.lg.com/us/burners-drives/lg-BE14NU40-external-blu-ray-dvd-drive
 Laptop Dell Inspiton N7110Last edited by hcanning; 25th Oct 2017 at 12:00. 
- 
	So you are maxing out your CPU at maximum read ? Not good since other processes will require CPU at the same time. 
 
 Thus maximum read speed is pointless since the whole point is to get the mean average >> 1x for 4 gb would take 1 hour (Do the rest of the maths yourself). If it takes significantly longer than the mean average then why stress the system.
- 
	Ok thanks I'm learning stuff here. So the laptop is a dedicated rip machine and I set it to use all 4 cores of cpu. So it appears my burner can read movie dvds (DVD Rom) I guess at 16x so that suggests a 1hr/16 time to copy 4gb in my bad math. My issue is converting my DVD to mp4 and getting the right balance to optimise speed and resource usage. Does 3 cores mean I convert at 75% time efficency. Thanks 
- 
	This looks weird - copying should not take more than 10 - 20% of modern CPU - perhaps high CPU utilization is somehow related to other, background ongoing activity - for example antivirus real time scanners can be memory and CPU hog... normally for copy DMA is used and as such CPU utilization is quite low. 
- 
	^^ Did not get a straight answer to my earlier question. 
 
 Just wonder if the OP confuses RIP = copy with Rip = Convert and that screenshot reflects the latter rather than the former.
- 
	Probably not ripping but re-encoding.My issue is converting my DVD to mp4
 
 Tell the software used for "ripping"
- 
	He's obviously re-encoding. The CPU is the bottleneck. Get a faster CPU or use faster (lower quality) encoder settings. 
Similar Threads
- 
  Ryzen upgrade with X1700 CPU, DDR4 RAM and M.2 SSDBy redwudz in forum ComputerReplies: 15Last Post: 26th Nov 2017, 01:23
- 
  Getting some speed out of a 6 core FX CPU?By bizzybody in forum Video ConversionReplies: 14Last Post: 24th Jan 2017, 23:04
- 
  Video rendering; is CPU, GPU, or RAM more important?By CursedLemon in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 9th Jul 2015, 16:00
- 
  Motherboard/CPU/RAM upgrade to 8 core AMD CPUBy redwudz in forum ComputerReplies: 26Last Post: 14th Dec 2013, 18:46
- 
  Restoration Encoding speed of 8 Core CPU vs 12 Core?By VideoFanatic in forum RestorationReplies: 11Last Post: 24th Jun 2013, 10:50


 
		
		 View Profile
				View Profile
			 View Forum Posts
				View Forum Posts
			 Private Message
				Private Message
			 
 
			
			
 Quote
 Quote 
			
