VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. I am using TIVTC on this anime source like I almost always do. It works fine like always, but in this particular source, it just will not get rid of all the interlacing.

    This is pretty bad and any attempt I have made to remove it all does not seem to be working out. Some of the lines in certain parts I cant stand.

    Its very noticeable when the entire screen is moving, and still noticeable when it isn't in some parts.

    Here are a couple untouched samples to look at. How can I get rid of it?


    https://mega.nz/#!dlQy0aYJ!9eIV9EsU1Sf_6Un4lmFGaRCLC8DFJrVwgDmwe1ETwX4

    https://mega.nz/#!88B01ByJ!4NPfrjqX5fEuw1fAjQ5mV_AOwU5K4h4Sh1qMCFoxraw
    Quote Quote  
  2. It looks to me like it's from a tape source whose fields aren't aligned properly. But I could be wrong. In any event, when I see crap like this I might try something like:

    QTGMC().SelectEven()

    perhaps followed by an anti-aliasing filter.
    Quote Quote  
  3. I tried QTGMC, and while it did reduce it quite a bit, it smeared or destroyed a lot of lines and details in several parts of the video.

    Is there anything I can do to help keep the lines more in tact?

    Here is one example. Look at the mouth and lines on the front piece of the hat over his eyes.


    TIVTC




    QTGMC

    Last edited by killerteengohan; 9th Feb 2017 at 22:04.
    Quote Quote  
  4. This works as a start for some shots:

    Code:
    Mpeg2Source("Sample 1.d2v") 
    TFM(pp=0)
    TFM(cthresh=40)
    Other shots need something more though. Will look at it more tomorrow...
    Quote Quote  
  5. Thank you!

    If I can provide anything else for when you look at it, just let me know.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Heres another sample so you have the exact part I took those screenshots from.

    https://mega.nz/#!p9h3xTpJ!XCHuXyNokYWWXG4o7tBF3T5m3wNNEF6Pya4H7TXBmZw
    Quote Quote  
  7. I spent a long time tweaking multiple parameters and reading about QTGMC's parameters.

    Apparently there are 2 parameters, that if I use them, the lines remain more like the original sources lines.

    sourcematch and lossless.

    I added sourcematch=3 to QTGMC and the details look so much better now, and closer to the original. I still have the lines problem though.

    It fixed the lines on the hat and other things, but it got worse on the mouth.
    Last edited by killerteengohan; 10th Feb 2017 at 18:38.
    Quote Quote  
  8. I played around with it some more and got it a little better:

    Code:
    Mpeg2Source("Sample 1.d2v") 
    src = last
    
    t = GetParity() ? Interleave(TFM(field=1, mode=5, pp=1), TFM(field=0, mode=5, pp=1)) : Interleave(TFM(field=0, pp=0), TFM(field=1, pp=0))
    q = QTGMC(preset="fast", Sharpness=0.5, sourcematch=3)
    TFM(t, cthresh=6, clip2=q)
    Santiag()
    vInverse()
    
    StackVertical(StackHorizontal(src.ChangeFPS(last), last), StackHorizontal(q, last))
    First I create a double fps video with a pair of interleaved TFMs and no post processing. This version, t, is left with comb artifacts when the video has motion at each field. Then I make another double fps version, q, with QTGMC. The idea is to use the TFM version when there no comb artifacts in t and the QTMGC version when there are comb artifacts in t. Unfortunately, it's hard to determine when a frame is still combed because sometimes thin horizontal lines confuse the detection algorithm. I used TFM for this final test and replacement. cthresh determines how much combing (true or mistaken) must be present before q is used instead of t. Lower values of cthresh will use q more often, higher values will use t more often. You can play around with that setting to suit your own taste. Then I ran Santiag() for a little antialiasing and vInverse() to remove some mild combing from slightly different luma levels in the two fields. You may want to remove those. At the end I stacked the videos for easy comparison. Top left is the original frame. Top right is the t frame, bottom left is the q frame, bottom right is the final chosen frame.

    In the end, I don't know if this is significantly better than just QTGMC.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Thanks! I will give that a try tonight.

    you can try this and see how it looks to compare if you want. If you like it any better, perhaps you can remember or use it in the future.

    QTGMC(preset="slow", fpsdivisor=2, sourcematch=3)
    maa2(ss=2.8)
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!