VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. I dont know what the problem is.

    Its not likes it's take 2 hours and is just taking a long time. it's physically just taking forever.


    I tried .wmv and .mp4


    When i do .wmv i will stop like half way threw.
    and when i do .mp4 the time will just keep increasing





    and as you can see, even tho i hit render it dosnt even take any ram or cpu usage for some reason


    Specs:
    i7-3770 3.4ghz
    16gb corsair vengace ram
    radeon HD 7970
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    I can't tell from that pic what program you're using. Does it have multicore support? Is it enabled?

    How do other encoding programs work?

    And, I have to ask, why encode to .wmv?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Originally Posted by Hoser Rob View Post
    I can't tell from that pic what program you're using.
    It's Sony Vegas Pro.

    It even says it on the top left of the image.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Yes, it is sony vegas. idky these r so low quality
    Quote Quote  
  5. DECEASED
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Heaven
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by mike20021969 View Post
    Originally Posted by Hoser Rob View Post
    I can't tell from that pic what program you're using.
    It's Sony Vegas Pro.

    It even says it on the top left of the image.
    Yes, the name is readable in the ORIGINAL, NOT-RESIZED image:

    https://forum.videohelp.com/attachments/20184-1380128930/comp1_zps1ea6b9aa.jpg

    So you must have an excellent vision, a HUGE monitor, or *both*.
    But I have to inform you, not everybody is as "lucky" as you
    Quote Quote  
  6. Originally Posted by El Heggunte View Post
    So you must have an excellent vision, a HUGE monitor, or *both*.
    But I have to inform you, not everybody is as "lucky" as you
    It must be excellent vision, as I'm viewing the image in first post on a 15" 1280x768 laptop screen
    Quote Quote  
  7. You have a motion effect on almost every shot and some sort of effect (snowflake, title?) over everything -- all very processor intensive. If it's 1920x1080 you can expect it to take a while.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member hech54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Yank in Europe
    Search PM
    After forking out $600 for this, you'd think Sony's online help would be your first stop.
    Anyway....without at least knowing what video/audio codecs you loaded INTO Vegas, everyone here can only guess what the problem is.
    Quote Quote  
  9. DECEASED
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Heaven
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by mike20021969 View Post
    It must be excellent vision, as I'm viewing the image in first post on a 15" 1280x768 laptop screen
    Viewing is EASY --- but managing to read what is written with tiny fonts in a downscaled JPG file is a different story.

    @ the OP: next time, please upload the images directly to Videohelp.

    And now, let's try to go back to the topic
    Last edited by El Heggunte; 25th Sep 2013 at 14:13. Reason: ........
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    By the way, are you rendering to your 2 TB drive?

    Brainiac
    Quote Quote  
  11. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    Mr. Ryan Eagle, you really shouldn't post links to publicly accessible folders that contain questionable images. It could get you a knock on your door...
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  12. You can draft render smaller parts of the timeline, until you find what portion of the timeline cannot be rendered. I observed that there are others that edit in Vegas and can't render some projects. I saw that someone rendered small portions of the timeline, until he found out that the portion that Vegas could not render, contained a photo, I think it was a PNG.
    Last edited by codemaster; 27th Sep 2013 at 01:19.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    The problem is your workflow.

    Like others mentioned, you want to avoid one big complex render at the end. Soooo...

    #1) Don't use full resolution 300 spi stills. Learn how to groom stills to a minimum size that meets the needs of the project. Stills are measured in three dimensions, cut down the dimension that doesn't affect viewability.

    #2) Pre-render Motion Graphics and composite them back in at final render.

    #3) Pre-render anything that's constant across the whole project, and will not change later.

    #4) Transcode "Kooky Kodecs", like WMV or Apple. into Mpeg2 i-frame. Vegas cannot render to a strict Apple compliant MP4 anyway, only QuickTime Pro can do it.

    #5) Build your project like a pyramid. Work it up to the final stone.

    #6) Don't expect the NLE to be too intelligent. You're the captain of the ship. No logic system can ever replace the captain of a ship. The NLE is dumb compared to you.

    #7) Learn to use "Nested Veggies". Vegas sees "Nested Veggies" as separate sub-renders and streamlines itself accordingly. Also, "Nested Veggies" allow you to change anything, anytime, anywhere, and not create a generation. Think of NV as virtual pre-renders.

    #8) Don't listen to "conventional wisdom". DO think in the real world, not dogma.

    In digital, "generations" are not like film. Film was limited to like three generations, but digital can be much higher. Don't fall into the mental trap that multi-render is prohibited. Multi-render is the life blood of editing.
    Last edited by budwzr; 27th Sep 2013 at 10:48.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!