VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Member Ygramul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Search Comp PM
    I just edited a simple clip that's about 4 minutes long and only has two video tracks and two audio tracks, but the rendering the output took well over 3 hours. I didn't even use any effects except picture-in-picture.

    Project settings: 1280 x 720 @ 25fps

    Output (created with Adobe Media Encoder): 1280 x 720 @ 25 fps, H.264, bitrate: 10000, quality: 75, audio: PCM

    I use Windows 7 32 bit, 4GB RAM and Phenom 955.

    Am I doing something wrong? I'm almost certain that rendering a similar clip a few months ago was a few times faster...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	sn02.png
Views:	629
Size:	20.3 KB
ID:	16735
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member Ygramul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Search Comp PM
    buuump
    Quote Quote  
  3. What's your source?
    How complex is your sequence?
    Does it play smoothly on the timeline?
    Did you clear out the cache and clean the database?
    What else are you running on your system?
    Adobe is up to CS6 now -- not ONLY to squeeze more money out of us.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member Ygramul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Search Comp PM
    - two WMVs (encoded with WMV9) and two WAVs
    - like I said, it's very simple. Read the original post again.
    - it doesn't play smoothly because of another problem. The preview in the program monitor gets very choppy after a few seconds. I tried to Google the problem, but didn't find any fixes.
    - I didn't, but I made the clip after a fresh install
    - nothing that requires a lot of memory - just a firewall, an antivirus and an instant messaging program
    - Windows 7 32 bit only supports versions up to CS4. I tried CS4 and even 2.0, but they both had the choppy preview problem, so I reverted to CS3.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    - two WMVs (encoded with WMV9) and two WAVs
    And their dimensions, framerates and bitrates are?

    Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    - like I said, it's very simple. Read the original post again.
    Don't be rude. A single video or audio track can have thousands of edits and hundreds of effects.

    Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    - it doesn't play smoothly because of another problem. The preview in the program monitor gets very choppy after a few seconds. I tried to Google the problem, but didn't find any fixes.
    Sounds like your processor and video card aren't up to the task of whatever you're doing.

    Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    - I didn't, but I made the clip after a fresh install
    Good
    Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    - nothing that requires a lot of memory - just a firewall, an antivirus and an instant messaging program
    Actually, if those are in an "always on" mode they can be a real drain. Disconnect from the internet and try turning them off.

    Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    - Windows 7 32 bit only supports versions up to CS4. I tried CS4 and even 2.0, but they both had the choppy preview problem, so I reverted to CS3.
    You're underpowered. I'm guessing you're doing something intense like changing the framerate or raster size. But that's as far as I can go with what you're giving.

    Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    I'm almost certain that rendering a similar clip a few months ago was a few times faster...
    What have you changed or installed since then?
    Last edited by smrpix; 20th Mar 2013 at 08:35.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member Ygramul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Search Comp PM
    And their dimensions, framerates and bitrates are?
    1280 x 720, 25, 9000

    Don't be rude. A single video or audio track can have thousands of edits and hundreds of effects.
    I'm not rude. I said "I didn't even use any effects except picture-in-picture". It looks like this and views switch three times in the whole project.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	bs0000.jpg
Views:	313
Size:	39.8 KB
ID:	16854


    Sounds like your processor and video card aren't up to the task of whatever you're doing.
    My processor and video card (Radeon 7850) should be enough. I'm not making Transformers 4 here.

    Actually, if those are in an "always on" mode they can be a real drain. Disconnect from the internet and try turning them off.
    Look, I'm no expert, but I can't see how that could possibly help me. The firewall and antivirus combined use a whopping 6 MB of system memory.

    You're underpowered. I'm guessing you're doing something intense like changing the framerate or raster size.
    Nope.

    What have you changed or installed since then?
    Plenty of things. Making a list would be impossible.
    Quote Quote  
  7. My advice is going to be pretty generic.

    I agree that your CPU and RAM should be more than adequate. You don't mention if you even have a graphics card let alone whether it's compatible.

    WMV is a horrible format to edit with -- but you say you've done it before. You also note, at this point you can't even play the 4 minute clip without it getting choppy.

    You also say you've made hundreds of changes to your system since it ran faster. There's probably something in there.

    Next time try converting to HDV or DVCProHD before editing. Your system should be more responsive.

    I assume you got through this render finally.

    Best of Luck.

    (If you loiter on the second link below, someone will come on to live chat you.)

    http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/premiere/pdfs/premiere-thirdparty-h...iorversion.pdf

    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/system-requirements-premiere-pro.htm...m_requirements
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member Ygramul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Search Comp PM
    I only use WMV because Premiere doesn't like a lot of popular codecs and containers. I just decided to convert to that before importing them because almost nothing else worked.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by Ygramul View Post
    Premiere doesn't like a lot of popular codecs and containers.
    Yeah, sorry to say, that's one of the reasons they've updated it.

    You're really constrained in your HD options with CS3. The two formats I mentioned above should be more responsive.

    You could try converting first to huffyuv or lagarith which will create huge files but maintain more of your original quality. I'm assuming you're shooting with a camcorder on SD cards. How are you doing the initial conversion to wmv? Is that fast?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member Ygramul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Search Comp PM
    The clips come from two sources. One is a Canon SX130 IS. It uses AVC and PCM. I don't know what the other camera is, but it's probably equally shitty.

    I use AVS Video Converter for conversion. I used to use Vdub to encode with Matrox codecs, but then something happened (I have no idea what) and it stopped working - it made the input file looks like a huge grey mess covered with artifacts.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!