VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 26th Jan 2010 20:47 #1
    wulf109
    wulf109 is offline
    Member wulf109's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I am un-impressed by the new Clarkdale from Intel. A case of too little for too much. I wonder if a Clarkdale Quad-core is in the future and please do away with the on CPU graphics.
    Quote Quote  
  2. 27th Jan 2010 22:43 #2
    RabidDog
    RabidDog is offline
    Member RabidDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    UK
    Search Comp PM
    As an Intel CPU designer, I will take your comments under consideration. Drop the on-core graphics you say??
    Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
    The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 27th Jan 2010 23:17 #3
    wulf109
    wulf109 is offline
    Member wulf109's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    AMD CPU's had on CPU memory controllers for years before Intel and it didn't help AMD outclass Intel C2D. The Intel C2D outran AMD,so the on CPU memory controller didn't help. I think a CPU should process program intructions and leave memory and video to the MB and and addon cards. All it does is increase the cost of a CPU by adding these "exrtras" to the CPU.
    Tests I read on the internet indicate on CPU memory controllers don't really improve performance. On CPU video is to new to know,but what I've read so far is negative.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!