Take a look at my video then video taken with the Canon MarkII 5D.
First mine on the Canon HV20
http://vimeo.com/4531903
and this on the Canon MarkII 5D
http://vincentlaforet.smugmug.com/gallery/6042742_wZKiA#424860674_7Ykfo-L-LB
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
Smile
Smile
-
All you're really showing is the difference between someone who knows what their doing and someone who doesn't.
-
The 5D has more depth, something you already know.
I only see one link here.Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
One link is embedded flash (maybe you have flash or java script blocked?), the other a link to vincentlaforet.smugmug.com.
By the way, I'm not saying there's no difference between the two cameras. But the difference between the two videos is more a demonstration of the knowledge of the cameraman (lighting, depth of field, post processing -- badly handled interlaced video, etc.) than than the capabilities of the cameras. -
Originally Posted by jagabo
The DOF is not something I can control (Unlike the MarkII). I'd like to know if someone can point me to a good tutorial on editing in postprocessing with an NLE.SmileSmile
-
In addition to the other comments, the distribution format/resolution/ specs are very different:
960x540 @ 1.8Mbps
640x368 @ 0.6Mbps
Also, the image is resized when using the vimeo embed function (not displayed at native size), which farther deteriorates the image quality, user experience, and performance (higher cpu usage required on the end user's part). You should always try to use native size for flash.
Your title says "getting it silky" , and "silky" generally refers to playback smoothness, or are you trying to describe something else? -
Originally Posted by beavereater