VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. Hey, I'm pretty sure this goes in this section (if not, I apologize). Anyways, I have a Panasonic DMR-ES15 recorder that works well for anything under 3 hours. However, the quality starts to turn crappy for anything over 3 hours (thanks to macroblocks). I was wondering if there was a program that would remove most of these macroblocks from the recorded video?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member FulciLives's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA in the USA
    Search Comp PM
    There are a variety of AviSynth filters for this.

    1.) Blockbuster
    2.) DeBlock

    http://www.avisynth.org

    http://avisynth.org/warpenterprises/

    Good Luck !!!

    - John "FulciLives" Coleman
    "The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
    EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
    Quote Quote  
  3. Mod Neophyte redwudz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    With AVI type formats, Smart Deblocker works fairly well. You can use it with VirtualDub Mod on MPEG, but it will output as a AVI type format and you will have to encode it back to MPEG. Info on Smart Deblocker here: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=103873

    AVIsynth is faster, but harder to configure for first timers.
    Quote Quote  
  4. So assuming I understand correctly, I would run one of the mentioned programs through either AVIsynth or V.Dub Mod, and then then re-encode the AVI output as an MPEG?

    Plus, what's the learning curve for V.Dub Mod? I hear that it's very useful for this sort of stuff, but was under the impression that it could be a noob's nightmare.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=270071

    Vdub to bbmpeg ... simple stuff .

    Bbmpeg also loads avisynth scripts .
    Quote Quote  
  6. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    It basically just blurs the image. Something like MSU Deblock is a "smart" blur, only happening at the edges, but a blur all the same. Such is the price you pay when you use inferior equipment (such as Panasonic machines using their own chipsets and unintelligent settings).
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member FulciLives's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA in the USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    It basically just blurs the image. Something like MSU Deblock is a "smart" blur, only happening at the edges, but a blur all the same. Such is the price you pay when you use inferior equipment (such as Panasonic machines using their own chipsets and unintelligent settings).
    LS !!!

    I missed ya ... good to see you back !!!

    - John "FulciLives" Coleman
    "The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
    EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    It basically just blurs the image. Something like MSU Deblock is a "smart" blur, only happening at the edges, but a blur all the same. Such is the price you pay when you use inferior equipment (such as Panasonic machines using their own chipsets and unintelligent settings).
    Agreed. All this talk about an initial poor encode, blurring the image, and then re-encoding(!) has me cringing.

    Surely not an "optimal quality" conversion method. If you *must* stick with your current recorder, I'd highly suggest using a higher bitrate and splitting the video across two discs.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    Evening everyone

    It strikes me funny, how people rely on the, SP quality mode of these
    recorders, when their goal would seem to be to re-process them again
    anyway. I mean, why rely on low bitrate for this ? It always strikes
    me something, when I hear to come to the conclusion of this.

    But just like echo1434; said, for re-processing purposes, one
    should alway use the *highest* quality mode or setting that the given
    recorder allows.

    In theory, a VBR encode would seem logical to utilize, in terms of the
    optimum compression ratio. But, this does not always apply to various
    machinary that incorporates MPEG archetecture. And, when encoding for
    highest quality, one should have an aim for I-Frame-like quality, that
    is.., where quality is based on I-frame (less compression) principals.

    Now, some Video Sources may be much cleaner, and can get away with a
    lower bitrate algorithem scheme, but not every video sources are lucky
    this way. Many are noisy. Take mine, for instance. I have Analog Cable.
    It is (in short) a noisy source. But, one thing that keeps me using it
    is the fact that this Source Medium does not suffer the MPEG artifacts
    that plauge many so called, high-quality -- Satellite, anyone ?

    I'm not sure about Digital Cable, but I know from experiences, that
    Satellite (MPEG-2) is full of mpeg artifacts, such as pixelations, and
    are found especially, in various motion scenarios.

    So, I comprimise, and opt for Analog Cable, and put up with the noise
    for the time being, in favor of no pixelation, with the small exception
    of those channels that my Cable Provider airs, that may incorporate a
    pre-processed MPEG video source. MTV, VHS, and BET are plauged by MPEG
    artifacts, mainly pixelation.., weather Analog Cable or Digital Cable
    or Satellite !!

    But, regardless..

    That is why I use (and choose) CBR and highest bitrate my MPEG encoder
    will allow -- be it a Software or Hardware based, MPEG Encoder.

    Althoug it might be that some users are not using the MSU Deblocking tool
    properly, and not acheaving the results expected, I myself sometimes use the
    block-reduction scheme found in TMPGenc, under the:

    ** Quantize Matrix\[x] Soften block noise

    ..with the [35] x [35] default setting.

    -vhelp 4182

    *~*!*~*!~* HaPpY HoLiDaYs *~*!*~*!~*
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!