VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 78
  1. Only few hours ago, Bill Gates and Toshiba Corp. President Atsutoshi Nishida, announced that they plan to develop high-definition DVD players together.
    It is a big win for the HD-DVD format in its competition against Blu-ray Disc, which is backed by Sony Corp and Apple Computers Inc., to become the world standard for next-generation of DVD players.

    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050627/ap_on_bi_ge/japan_microsoft_toshiba
    Quote Quote  
  2. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    From now on, I'm a devoted supporter of Blu Ray!!!!
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Hmmmm.

    An HD-DVD player with the Blu Screen Of Death.

    I think I'll pass, thanks anyway DRM Bill.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The bottom of the planet
    Search Comp PM
    The new technojoke:

    Q. Which is the ideal format to support in a war?

    A. The one that Bill Gates doesn't.
    "It's getting to the point now when I'm with you, I no longer want to have something stuck in my eye..."
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member normcar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA - IL
    Search Comp PM
    Bigbrother Bill will not succeed in hijacking the DVD formats. I suspect the winner will be the format, which has the least amount of problems, and is the easiest to use. Ease of use usually wins (except for MS Windows, where Bigbrother Bill created an illegal monopoly). BB's support will hurt as much as help. If both formats are easy to use, then there will be multiformat drives.
    Some days it seems as if all I'm doing is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    Anything for a vote against Microsoft.

    Cost will be the most important factor in deciding which format will win.

    How many people here use Dual layer dvdrs compared to single layer?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Houston,Tx
    Search Comp PM
    I'm a supporter of Blu-Ray.
    "What It Do"
    Huh ?????
    Quote Quote  
  8. I've always been a supporter of blu-ray and now more than ever. Its clearly superior to HD-DVD from a longevity standpoint and yet Billy is backing Toshiba strictly to make life difficult for the PS3. Not that I care about the PS3 (ironically I'm anti-sony) but for consumers its royal pain in the ass.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by misterchuckles
    Its clearly superior to HD-DVD from a longevity standpoint
    Betamax was superior than VHS, but VHS won in the end.
    Quote Quote  
  10. exactly...you'd think they'd learn from their stupid mistakes. But then again, its never been about convenience on the consumer end.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Blu-ray has more capacity, with 50 gigabytes, compared to 30 gigabytes for HD-DVD disks. But proponents of HD-DVD say their format is cheaper to make because the production method is similar to current DVDs.
    Can anyone offer an educated guess on the possible differences in price with the two formats?
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Hmm, seems a good strategy for the diabolical Mr. Gates.

    1) Firmly establish VC-1 in HD Players. Blu-Ray will have to respond.

    2) Optimize HD DVD players for MS HTPC based home networking (using VC-1 of course).

    3) Stick it to the PS3.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member Xylob the Destroyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Earth, for now
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by normcar
    ...except for MS Windows, where Bigbrother Bill created an illegal monopoly...
    not
    if it were a monopoly, there would be no alternatives
    there are 'viable' alternatives to Windows
    it's not his fault that nobody can come up with something better
    that's like saying that Ford had a monopoly with the Model T...
    there were other options, they just weren't as good.
    "To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research." - Steven Wright
    "Megalomaniacal, and harder than the rest!"
    Quote Quote  
  14. not
    if it were a monopoly, there would be no alternatives
    there are 'viable' alternatives to Windows
    it's not his fault that nobody can come up with something better
    Troll Alert.

    Microsoft was a Monopoly - this was the ruling of the US Federal District Court which was uphled on appeal by the US Supreme Court. Get over it.

    Windows being the "better" product is like saying VHS was the better product compared to Betamax. Windows was either the only option or simply the cheaper option. Better never entered into it.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Comon Sony
    And technically Betamax was the better product over VHS.
    Geronimo
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Redd
    Comon Sony
    And technically Betamax was the better product over VHS.
    An how was Betamax technically better when it took two tapes to record a movie? Betamax did not fit the consumer market and was a terrible failure.

    Similar mistakes were made by Apple, Next, BeOS, Linux, .... you name it.


    Read these two perspectives
    http://www.betainfoguide.com/BetaBetter.html

    It should be obvious why VHS (and Windows) won.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Betamax was better built! Better tape! Hardly any degrading like VHS does by sitting in a cabinet. If you wouldn't believe it, my father still has his beta from the early 80's. And his recorded tapes still work & look better than his VHS tapes from the early 90's.

    With Bill Gates jumping on does this mean he is going to pull his balding head out his @$$ and include HD-DVD support on the 360?
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member Xylob the Destroyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Earth, for now
    Search Comp PM
    of course not!
    that'll be a feature that you can purchase 'add-on' funtionality for the system that comes out after 360...
    personally, i'm looking forward to Blu-Ray, and as the PS3 will play BD movies, that works out for me
    if the upcoming 'format war' proves HD-DVD to be the winner, then I'll buy an HD-DVD player after the dust settles and prices have finally become reasonable -- at least I'll still be able to play my BD movies on my PS3.
    this one is a tough call at this point, but I think Blu-Ray will win.
    "To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research." - Steven Wright
    "Megalomaniacal, and harder than the rest!"
    Quote Quote  
  19. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by The Stinger
    Betamax was better built! Better tape! Hardly any degrading like VHS does by sitting in a cabinet. If you wouldn't believe it, my father still has his beta from the early 80's. And his recorded tapes still work & look better than his VHS tapes from the early 90's.

    With Bill Gates jumping on does this mean he is going to pull his balding head out his @$$ and include HD-DVD support on the 360?
    All Urban Myth.

    There wasn't much real difference between the formats in terms of video quality. Longevity was a tape issue and that was equal Betamax-VHS. S-VHS surpassed Betamax and U-Matic in most ways but still failed in the market because video quality was low on the list of consumer wants.
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Xylob the Destroyer
    of course not!
    that'll be a feature that you can purchase 'add-on' funtionality for the system that comes out after 360...
    personally, i'm looking forward to Blu-Ray, and as the PS3 will play BD movies, that works out for me
    if the upcoming 'format war' proves HD-DVD to be the winner, then I'll buy an HD-DVD player after the dust settles and prices have finally become reasonable -- at least I'll still be able to play my BD movies on my PS3.
    this one is a tough call at this point, but I think Blu-Ray will win.
    Blu-Ray serves my needs best but that is a S-VHS kind of mentality. The mass market doesn't really care so the format wars are wide open for staking mass market territory. Mr. Gates has proven to be a master at winning these wars.

    Remember VC-1 and H.264 can force many more hours on those HD DVDs. DRM advocates want the material as tightly compressed as possible (but with adequate display quality) to keep reauthoring under control.
    Quote Quote  
  21. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by edDV
    Originally Posted by Xylob the Destroyer
    of course not!
    that'll be a feature that you can purchase 'add-on' funtionality for the system that comes out after 360...
    personally, i'm looking forward to Blu-Ray, and as the PS3 will play BD movies, that works out for me
    if the upcoming 'format war' proves HD-DVD to be the winner, then I'll buy an HD-DVD player after the dust settles and prices have finally become reasonable -- at least I'll still be able to play my BD movies on my PS3.
    this one is a tough call at this point, but I think Blu-Ray will win.
    Blu-Ray serves my needs best but that is a S-VHS kind of mentality. The mass market doesn't really care so the format wars are wide open for staking mass market territory. Mr. Gates has proven to be a master at winning these wars.

    Remember VC-1 and H.264 can force many more hours on those HD DVDs. DRM advocates want the material as tightly compressed as possible (but with adequate display quality) to keep reauthoring under control.
    So you seem like a Microsoft junkie. So maybe you know...Since he is now supporting the HD-DVD format, will he include it with the 360? I don't see why you wouldn't want more space for HD games. So you wouldn't have to compress it to fit on a DVD9.
    Quote Quote  
  22. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    "So you seem like a Microsoft junkie."

    Why do you assume that? Art of War states you must know and respect your enemy in order to defeat him.

    But I'm not at war with Mr.Gates. My needs are to anticipate his moves and adapt.
    Quote Quote  
  23. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by edDV
    "So you seem like a Microsoft junkie."

    Why do you assume that? Art of War states you must know and respect your enemy in order to defeat him.

    But I'm not at war with Mr.Gates. My needs are to anticipate his moves and adapt.

    Just stating you seem to know a lot about Microsoft, so I could ask a question about the next Xbox.
    Quote Quote  
  24. Member AlecWest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Vader, WA, USA
    Search Comp PM
    I anticipate that the popularity of the current DVD format will be around for some time to come. This has all the earmarks of the last format war (VHS/BETA) and people who remember it will "wait" until the war is over before jumping on the HD player bandwagon ... unless someone creates a dual-format HD player (which will likely be horrendously expensive). And, there are some similarities to the Quadraphonic Stereo war (SQ/Discrete) in which everybody lost ... since both formats crashed and burned, leaving consumers (like me) stuck with the equipment.

    I can't speak for others. But, for me, I'm waiting until the war is over ... and even then, will continue to wait until prices come down considerably.
    Quote Quote  
  25. Sony losses again.
    Seriously I couldn't care less what format is better as long as there will be a big selection of movies(readVD-AUDIO) and cheap media.
    Quote Quote  
  26. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by AlecWest
    '... unless someone creates a dual-format HD player (which will likely be horrendously expensive).

    I can't speak for others. But, for me, I'm waiting until the war is over ... and even then, will continue to wait until prices come down considerably.
    What we are seeing are pre-release tactics. MPeg2 HD streams are a given. Backward compatibility to current DVD is a given. This is all about VC-1 vs H.264 vs other MPeg4 vs other not named codec for the much tighter compressed next generation. These guys are fighting for 2009 not 2006. Mpeg2 will quickly fall to MPeg4 or other.
    Quote Quote  
  27. Member Skith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Bottom of the ocean
    Search Comp PM
    Strange, there is a news post about this over at cdrinfo.com but it also states that gates is remaining neutral between the HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray formats.

    link
    Some people say dog is mans best friend. I say that man is dog's best slave... At least that is what my dogs think.
    Quote Quote  
  28. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    He needs both and can exploit HD DVD to advance VC-1 on both formats.

    PS: The article shows Gates leveraging HD DVD to promote VC-1.

    News Flash: HD DVD may evolve into a VC-1 only technology to put hours of HDTV on a small DVD and thus forcing Blu-Ray to offer the same.
    Quote Quote  
  29. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    I hope DRM doesn't make it into either one of them
    Quote Quote  
  30. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    no contest

    Both will be encrypted and require HDMI for display in HDTV.

    No HDMI? Then only 480p 720x480 max. Maybe they will limit to 480i only.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!