VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. Is it possible to have a camcorder tape on the minidv and send out a live feed to a television set at the same time? Thanks.
    Quote Quote  
  2. I guess you mean to record with camcorder and monitor the recording on TV.
    The answer is: yes, it is possible.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    It can depend on make and manufacture, too. A good program for laptops created to exploit this feature is DV Rack. It came out just recently and will allow you to run diagnostics on the video you are recording. It gives you many advanced features that you would normally have to setup after recording the event. It's cost is $499, though.

    There are also Firestore harddrives that give you longer recording times than what miniDV tapes allow. They attach to the camcorder but their price is well over $1000. 'Sides, I think DV Rack will let you record to your laptop harddrive, as well.
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    It would be even cheaper to just hook up another dv cam to your main cam
    taking the video through firewire (firewire to firewire)

    But this is impossible to do, as firewire will not record firewire (digital)
    from a cam to cam through firewire. Becuase Cams only have 4-pin connectors.
    .
    I tried this already w/ my ADVC and dv CAM, and set my ADVC to digital, and
    it still would not trasnfer my my DV cam's output to ADVC's firewire.

    It just doesn't work. I posted a question here a few days ago, and it went
    un answered. Casue it can't be done.

    Your only option is that $1000 portable hd. that's really to bad. Cause
    you can get dirt cheap DV ca for under $200 (I did)

    --> and

    -vhelp 3084
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by vhelp
    It would be even cheaper to just hook up another dv cam to your main cam
    taking the video through firewire (firewire to firewire)

    But this is impossible to do, as firewire will not record firewire (digital)
    from a cam to cam through firewire. Becuase Cams only have 4-pin connectors.
    .
    I tried this already w/ my ADVC and dv CAM, and set my ADVC to digital, and
    it still would not trasnfer my my DV cam's output to ADVC's firewire.

    It just doesn't work. I posted a question here a few days ago, and it went
    un answered. Casue it can't be done.

    Your only option is that $1000 portable hd. that's really to bad. Cause
    you can get dirt cheap DV ca for under $200 (I did)

    --> and

    -vhelp 3084
    You could also just run it through to a laptop that has your capture software on it... Some camera's won't go to sleep if you have them plugged in to ac. Some require you to leave the tape door open. Try both.
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    No. What I posted here (and my original thread on this) is like this:

    DV cam 4-pin --> (ADVC 6-pin -from- ADVC 4-pin) --> PC

    Or,

    DV cam 4-pin --> 2nd DV CAM 4-pin --> PC

    .. I don't have this working, because they don't make 4-pin to 4-pin
    .. wires for this - that's my understanding. But this would be the
    .. best method/approach to record in 'digital' and w/out recompressing
    .. the DV source, because once the DV from 1st cam is sent over to the
    .. 2nd DV cam's 4-pin, and because both cams are 'digital' (and they
    .. would understand this) it would not recompress again, but just store
    .. it 'digitally' onto the 2nd cams miniDV tape


    This is the method I want to use.., and others here can too. But it does
    not seem feasable (though in my head, it does)

    So, I'm confused at the moment.

    -vhelp 3085
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by vhelp
    No. What I posted here (and my original thread on this) is like this:

    DV cam 4-pin --> (ADVC 6-pin -from- ADVC 4-pin) --> PC

    Or,

    DV cam 4-pin --> 2nd DV CAM 4-pin --> PC

    .. I don't have this working, because they don't make 4-pin to 4-pin
    .. wires for this - that's my understanding. But this would be the
    .. best method/approach to record in 'digital' and w/out recompressing
    .. the DV source, because once the DV from 1st cam is sent over to the
    .. 2nd DV cam's 4-pin, and because both cams are 'digital' (and they
    .. would understand this) it would not recompress again, but just store
    .. it 'digitally' onto the 2nd cams miniDV tape


    This is the method I want to use.., and others here can too. But it does
    not seem feasable (though in my head, it does)

    So, I'm confused at the moment.

    -vhelp 3085
    4-pin to 4-pin cables do exist. They were the first ones in production. 4-pin to 6-pin came later, when external firewire harddrives started showing up. Older 4-pin firewire capture cards could not run harddrives.

    Why do you want to daisy chain cameras? Does one of them have a working video section but no working VTR? And does the second one have a VTR but no working video section? Please clarify what it is you imagine yourself accomplishing from wasting a 2nd camera by making it pass and therefore mimic the signal of the first. You're not making any sense. You can't go from 1st cam->2nd cam->PC anyway because there is no way to physically split the firewire jack on the second camera so it will go to both the 1st cam and the PC. And also firewire instructions for cameras only work in one direction at a time. Even if it were physically possible, the 2nd cam cannot "receive" from the 1st and "send" to the PC simultaneously. Only firewire harddrives are set for this, which is why the use 6-pin to 6-pin.
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    Ok, I try and explain briefly.

    On one of my cams, I have the ability to shoot progressively with very
    good results (I believe the cam does an Hardware Area Based de-interlace)
    and very good too. What I do is capture it to my hard drive through FW.
    .
    The problem arrises when you want to take your came away from the pc and
    record to miniDV tapes while shooting footage. This feature of Progressive
    video does not record to tape.
    .
    I can however, still work it, but only through the CAM's s-video out, and
    record to my 2nd CAM's tape through s-video, because i found out that the
    (Progressive video) is not limited to FW, but also passes across the s-video
    as well. So, I can record to miniDV tapes this way w/ good results. But,
    I want to eliminate the re-compression to DV. The s-video route is re
    compressing the DV again.., though not so bad. I can also run the s-video
    through my ADVC-100 with same results of Progressive video, but it's also
    re compressing it to DV.
    .
    If I can pass DV cam A to dv cam B through firewire, and let dv cam B
    record the footage from dv cam A, thought firewire (redundant) I could
    have the best results, because nothing would get a 2nd re compression, and
    the results would look as in the first cam's shooting.

    If I can do the above, then I can add another alternatative receipe to
    my video projects.

    Hope that made sense now

    -vhelp 3086
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I think you were setting your PC to frame based capture and it was creating a deinterlaced picture from your camera. I seriously doubt your camera is going to have a progressive option you cannot record to tape, unless you are capturing through your camera's "photo mode". Is that what you are doing?

    I take it cam 2 does not have a progressive mode either, otherwise you would've just recorded using it.
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    No.

    The cam (cam A) has a memory mode..

    Video | MEMORY

    While my dv is passing through my FW to my hd, and inside RsDvCap.exe 's
    window, when cam B is switched (default) to Video, the source is pure
    Interlace. That is the cams default mode of operation. Normal for any
    cam. However.
    When I switch to MEMORY mode, on cam A, it on-the-fly performs
    a Hardware de-interlace (I believe its an area based deinterlace) and
    passes this through the cam through FW and S-Video connections of this cam.
    .
    .. It's probably part of the photo feature of the cam.. I'm sure.
    .
    I've capture through FW and S-Video, all Progressive frames, and is a
    29.970 fps, and all frames are progressive, not 15 fps, but 29.970 fps.

    .. I'm amazed at the quality this form of HDI performs for this old cam.
    .. I wish this feature was incorproated for other cams as well.
    .. .
    .. To my knowledge and vast experience in things (methods) of de-interlacing
    .. (be it AVIsynth or vdub) there is simply no other method better than this.
    .. Bar none.


    It's not perfect, but much better than other methods I've seen and done.
    * Done with my software scripting experience
    * and done with my TRV22 cam (has this feature, under digital effect)
    .. but the problem w/ the TRV22, is that you get a lot of stair-steps or
    .. saw tooth effect, and its just not the same. YOu can see it very clearly,
    .. that it's a poor job, in the end.. and no contents again my CAM HDI.

    -vhelp 3088
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by vhelp
    No.

    The cam (cam A) has a memory mode..

    Video | MEMORY

    While my dv is passing through my FW to my hd, and inside RsDvCap.exe 's
    window, when cam B is switched (default) to Video, the source is pure
    Interlace. That is the cams default mode of operation. Normal for any
    cam. However.
    When I switch to MEMORY mode, on cam A, it on-the-fly performs
    a Hardware de-interlace (I believe its an area based deinterlace) and
    passes this through the cam through FW and S-Video connections of this cam.
    .
    .. It's probably part of the photo feature of the cam.. I'm sure.
    .
    I've capture through FW and S-Video, all Progressive frames, and is a
    29.970 fps, and all frames are progressive, not 15 fps, but 29.970 fps.

    .. [i]I'm amazed at the quality this form of HDI performs for this old cam.
    .. I wish this feature was incorproated for other cams as well.
    .. .
    .. To my knowledge and vast experience in things (methods) of de-interlacing
    .. (be it AVIsynth or vdub) there is simply no other method better than this.
    .. Bar none.

    It's not perfect, but much better than other methods I've seen and done.
    * Done with my software scripting experience
    * and done with my TRV22 cam (has this feature, under digital effect)
    .. but the problem w/ the TRV22, is that you get a lot of stair-steps or
    .. saw tooth effect, and its just not the same. YOu can see it very clearly,
    .. that it's a poor job, in the end.. and no contents again my CAM HDI.

    -vhelp 3088
    MEMORY=photo mode
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    ok. I'll take your word for it.

    But it still looks great.
    -vhelp 3090
    Quote Quote  
  13. Mod Neophyte redwudz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    Uh, vhelp, a six pin Firewire just has the two extra pins for power, + and - , not for any signals. Other than that, they have the same four signal pins as the four pin. I use the six pin to power my external laptop Firewire drive.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by redwudz
    Uh, vhelp, a six pin Firewire just has the two extra pins for power, + and - , not for any signals. Other than that, they have the same four signal pins as the four pin. I use the six pin to power my external laptop Firewire drive.
    I guess there are no external enclosures that have a 4-pin socket, though, correct?
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    Ok. I have an update. With some success - finally.

    I spent the afternoon combing the are for a 4-pint to 4-pin FW cable.
    I finally came across one a 6' gold plated ($24.99 - got it at that
    price because it was mislabled or something) It was one of those kits that
    have all the different heads and you just use the ones you need. Anyways.

    So, when I finally made it home (had to shop for food too you know) I
    put the 4-pin adaptrs on each end, pluged in my DV cams to each other, and..
    success. It worked perfectly.
    .
    Now I can finally do that experiment I've ben putting off for a year or so

    To the topic at hand ...

    @ Sillyname

    Yes, you can do what you asked for. Now one does not need a $1000 ext HD
    for this. Just find a cheap/used dv cam for $200 bucks (can get pretty
    much anywhere's) run a 4-pin to 4-pin through each cams' DV connectors,
    and you can now record to another DV cam. Course, that makes no sense in
    this case, cause you could use your first cam for that BUT..
    .
    If your *other* cam has a special feature that can only operate in a certain
    setting (as in mine) the above is the perfect solution vs. a $1000 ext HD
    In my case, I'm taking advantage of a feature that my cam gives me, which
    is 29.970 fps Progresive video footage - full frame. That's the bute.

    Now, I have to post this answer to myself (note to self) in my other thread

    Thanks all.
    -vhelp 3091
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!