OK, I promise to stop this soon.But at least this is a simple two cap comparison
Cap01
Cap02
![]()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 35
-
-
I liked the second one because it seems to look better.
If God had intended us not to masturbate he would've made our arms shorter.
George Carlin -
Originally Posted by bazooka
Originally Posted by only_emo_kid -
only_emo_kidGuest
oh... i c, I thought the part of the newspaper that was circled was something u had highlighted or something lmao i'm dumb
-
Look about the same.
Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
Originally Posted by lordsmurf
Thank you Lordsmurf. -
Suggestion...try centering the 1st cap on your screen and then hit your "Page Down" key on your keyboard. I don't know if the resolution you have your monitor set to makes a difference, but at 1024x768 I can then alternate between the "Page Up" and "Page Down" keys and the two images perfectly overlap. Changing between them makes the differences more easily recognizable.
-
Makes me dizzy.
Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
What's the source and what format was it captured to?
The top letterboxed area appears blocky under a blue gun, you may want to re-mattte it in your encoding or editing software, which you probably will (so disregard).
Image 2 under blue:
-
Originally Posted by lordsmurf
Originally Posted by freestyler
Blue Gun -- interesting effect. Exactly how did you do it? -
Just dropped it into photoshop and ran up the blues all the way, there are a few diff ways to do it, its like the feature on broadcast monitors called "blue gun" type of effect
for still images it helps find blocky areas, ie. artifacts, etc
i believe vegas and premiere allow this as well (video)
capture doesn't look bad for vhs, i would probably go with the second one after adding new letterboxing -
The top one appears "darker", but I'm betting it's probably just because the bottom one is too light. There is no way to judge this as stills on a computer monitor.
Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
I think he said that he taped his DVD to his VCR
Is this the movie, Spiderman ??
I think I much like the bottom pic, because it seems to look "original" (due to
the lighter color)
EDITED by vhelp
Cheers,
-vhelp -
I think that the bottom looks just a little brighter. Next time try to use something with a little more skin tone in it. I know that it is not the professional standard, but as far as guessing which looks better it is more natural to see if the skin tone looks right.
IS IT SUPPOSED TO SMOKE LIKE THAT? -
The reason I liked the bottom pic was because it looked more natural, that is,
that it looked like it was captured w/out being touched.
But, my assumption earlier (and now) is that the user captured it w/ an
hardwared device (probably an MPEG-2 device, because softare real-time'ers
leave more blocks because of the corners they have to cut, in order to keep
the framerate w/in respect/comprimoise
Question:
* What device did you use ??
.. or, are you saving that for the final conclusion ?
.. .. what it the Hauppauge's PVR-USB2 ?? (looks like a good comprimise in
.. .. quality)
Cheers,
-vhelp -
Actualy the top one is a bit better.
If you have Photoshop or somthing that does layers with adjustment for opaque then bring both in. drop on on top of the other and adjust by varing the opaque. The top one seems to have more detail better edges. Less interleave etc. Try this.
-
.
.
They should have been .PNG files (or at least made available to D/L) because
this is a Lossless format.., where-as, .JPG/JPEG are not. And, then add blocks
to the image, and when posted, leaves us drawing the wrong conclusions.
I know I've seen elwhere's, where it was hinted/advised not to use .JPG's,
but people continue to use them
And, when posting pics, for us to conclude/theorize on, size shouldn't be an
issue
post some .PNG's
@ BrainStorm69
Not to start an OT, but..
* What chapter was that from ??
* And, although the first one was my favirote, I have yet to see the 2nd one.
Thanks,
-vhelp -
Originally Posted by vhelp
-
Originally Posted by vhelp
Originally Posted by vhelp
Originally Posted by NightWing
You can also see the differences by checking the black "framing corners" on the upper and lower right side of the cap.
Originally Posted by junkmalle -
hmm..
I didn't see your capture card in the capture list:
* Capture Card List ( AVER.. )
I'm just curious, that's all
Cheers,
-vhelp -
Originally Posted by vhelp
https://www.videohelp.com/capturecards.php?CaptureCardRead=213#comments
PS: I have the version with the Philips chip, not the BT878 -
One. It looks crisper on the edges.
-
Is there any test pattern you can record?
Some times they can determine a bit better than a picture. -
Yeah.., I'm with that. A test pattern.
Something what we all could use (make it become our standard here) and
author it as a VOB file, so that we can D/L it, burn to DVD-R and play it in
our DVD player, and capture it w/ our capture cards/devices.
.
But, make several different patterns (for different aspects of testing certain
conditions or whatever "math" might be behind it) ..throw them in our Tools
section, under Samples area (if you have a "samples" area, if not, there
should be such an area, so that everyone has access to Samples that vcdhelp
decided upon as being what we all need to obtain - Approximate) ..give or
take a few proper wordings
.
(I lost all my test patterns in a crash, so I'm really just too lazy to go looking
around the net for them again)
Maybe BJ_M will do the honor's ??
-vhelp