VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. Is is best to record a VCD or DVD if I have under a hour of video from a digital camcorder? Video is Transfered to my computer via firewire.
    What disc has the best picture?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member daamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    Search Comp PM
    Hi spummerr,

    As long as it's done properly (i.e. sufficient bitrate during encoding etc.) then DVD hands down.

    There's also a whole load of other factors too:

    Are you capturing dierct to MPEG, or going to AVI first?
    If the former, you needa decent card.
    If the latter, you need to use a good encoder with the right settings.
    etc. etc.
    There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.

    Carpe diem.

    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member ZippyP.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lotus Land
    Search Comp PM
    DVD has three basic resolutions, they are (for NTSC):
    352x240 called 1/4 DVD or VCD.
    352x480 called 1/2 DVD or CVD.
    720x480 full D1.

    VCD is the lowest and crappiest resolution. For camcorder footage 1/2 DVD is generally regarded as the closest equivalent and should give good results. Upsizing video is not recommended and your source is not high resolution to start out with. Whether you use full or 1/2 DVD, you will get much better results than VCD.
    "Art is making something out of nothing and selling it." - Frank Zappa
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member daamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by ZippyP.
    For camcorder footage 1/2 DVD is generally regarded as the closest equivalent and should give good results.
    Zippyp. - My PAL DV cam results in an AVI on the PC at 720x576 (would be 720 x 480 for NTSC). This is full D1 so not sure what you mean here...? As the footage is transferred and not captured, does that not mean that the DV cam also records at full D1?
    There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.

    Carpe diem.

    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member ZippyP.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lotus Land
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by daamon
    My PAL DV cam results in an AVI on the PC at 720x576
    Sounds like full DVD res. to me. I wasn't aware that DV went that high, now I know better .
    "Art is making something out of nothing and selling it." - Frank Zappa
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member daamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by ZippyP.
    I wasn't aware that DV went that high, now I know better
    I wasn't aware that it could be any lower - I've learnt something too.

    @ spummerr - The way to check is to capture to your chosen format (be it AVI or MPEG2, I'd suggest AVI for this experiment) and us AVICodec on it to get the resolution.
    There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.

    Carpe diem.

    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Greetings Supreme2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Right Here, Right Now
    Search Comp PM
    I thought that most DV cams were at least 640x480.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    DV is currently 720x480/576. Period.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  9. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    And don't forget: DVD is also 704 x 576/480. It is called cropped D1

    PAL DV if I recall correct can be 768 x 576 (in theory)
    La Linea by Osvaldo Cavandoli
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    DV is currently 720x480/576. Period.
    Correct, DV format (including Digital8) is full broadcast resolution luminance 720x480/576 and quarter resolution chrominance (4:1:1 or 4:2:0). Studio broadcast standard is 4:2:2 or half resolution chrominance.

    So the home DV format is very nearly as good a recording format as the broadcasters use and identical quality to Sony DVCAM and Panasonic's DVCPRO broadcast standards.*

    There is a big "but" and that is the camera section of home DV camcorders that falls substantially short of those resolutions.

    * there are minor differences unrelated to image quality.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member JimJohnD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Ohio U.S.A.
    Search Comp PM
    It's nice to see that people will take the time to read even the most BASIC FAQs like the "What Is" at the top of this page.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by SatStorm
    And don't forget: DVD is also 704 x 576/480. It is called cropped D1

    PAL DV if I recall correct can be 768 x 576 (in theory)
    In theory it can be 15,000 x 10,000, but the definition of DV is 720 x 480 NTSC/576PAL. Period.

    MPEG is a different animal and the 16 pixels get lost because of the nature of MPEG architecture. But don't confuse it with DV.

    Any speculation about the theoretical limit of DV is meaningless since the DV consortium hasn't adopted it as a standard. Here's a good refresher on DV and other related formats:

    http://www.adamwilt.com/DV-FAQ-tech.html
    Quote Quote  
  13. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    I didn't confuse it with DV. How you end up with this?

    I said that the legal DVD framesizes are 720 / 704 / 352 x 480 NTSC / 576 PAL. In other words, there are four not three legal framesizes for DVD (ZippyP.mention the three of them)

    I don't remember where I read that 768 x 576 is the top for PAL, like what is the 720 x 480 for NTSC. It was somewhere I read in this forum (or it was doom?).
    That's why I used the phrase "If I recall correct"
    And believe it has to do something with the correct aspect ratio of PAL.
    Fulcilives could help on this (BTW, where is he?)
    La Linea by Osvaldo Cavandoli
    Quote Quote  
  14. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by SatStorm
    I didn't confuse it with DV. How you end up with this?

    I said that the legal DVD framesizes are 720 / 704 / 352 x 480 NTSC / 576 PAL. In other words, there are four not three legal framesizes for DVD (ZippyP.mention the three of them)

    I don't remember where I read that 768 x 576 is the top for PAL, like what is the 720 x 480 for NTSC. It was somewhere I read in this forum (or it was doom?).
    That's why I used the phrase "If I recall correct"
    And believe it has to do something with the correct aspect ratio of PAL.
    Fulcilives could help on this (BTW, where is he?)
    John hasn't been around. Several people are looking for him for various reasons
    Quote Quote  
  15. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    I don't know the background story...
    I just remember reading telling that he has problems with his PC back in Augost

    Anyway, does anyone else remember 768 x 576 for PAL DV?
    La Linea by Osvaldo Cavandoli
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    768x576 is the square pixel 4:3 aspect ratio for 625/50 video. Its the direct analogy to 640x480 for 525/60.

    768x486 also works out to NTSC 525/59.94 sampled at 4x subcarrier (14.3 MHz) as was done in NTSC composite digital formats including D2.

    720x480/576 (non square pixels) was a compromise that was met for the D1 (4:2:2) standard that allowed both 525/59.94 and 625/50 component digital video to both work at the same 13.5MHz sample rate.

    What was the question again?
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member daamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    Search Comp PM
    @ SatStorm

    Does this shed any light?

    Or maybe this (section 2)?

    EDIT: edDV got in before me, and with much better info... Though I think the links allure to what he said...
    There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.

    Carpe diem.

    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by daamon
    @ SatStorm

    Does this shed any light?

    Or maybe this (section 2)?

    EDIT: edDV got in before me, and with much better info... Though I think the links allure to what he said...
    More good links
    http://broadcastengineering.com/mag/broadcasting_composite_digital_video/
    http://www.kensystem.com/kensys/vtr.htm
    http://www.nvision1.com/Serv/RefLib/TheBook/chapter13.asp
    http://www.zerocut.com/tech/vid_img.htm
    Quote Quote  
  19. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    Yeah, exactly that: I knew that I read somewhere about 768 x 576 for PAL but I didn't remember what it was about. It was about the aspect, right...
    Thanks edDV and daamon
    La Linea by Osvaldo Cavandoli
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!